Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: a preliminary study
- PMID: 27671899
- PMCID: PMC5486541
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1944-x
Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: a preliminary study
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, we examine three-dimensional (3D) proctoring tools (i.e., semitransparent ghost tools overlaid on the surgeon's field of view) on realistic surgical tasks. Additionally, we develop novel, quantitative measures of whether proctors exploit the additional capabilities offered by ghost tools.
Methods: Seven proctor-trainee pairs completed realistic surgical tasks such as tissue dissection and suturing in a live porcine model using 3D ghost tools on the da Vinci Xi Surgical System. The usability and effectiveness of 3D ghost tools were evaluated using objective measures of proctor performance based on proctor hand movements and button presses, as well as post-study questionnaires.
Results: Proctors exploited the capabilities of ghost tools, such as 3D hand movement (p < 0.001), wristedness (p < 0.001), finger pinch gestures (p < 0.001), and bimanual hand motions (p < 0.001). The median ghost tool excursion distances across proctors in the x-, y-, and z-directions were 57.6, 31.9, and 50.7, respectively. Proctors and trainees consistently evaluated the ghost tools as effective across multiple categories of mentoring. Trainees found ghost tools more helpful than proctors across all categories (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Proctors exploit the augmented capabilities of 3D ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios. Additionally, both proctors and trainees evaluated ghost tools as effective mentoring tools, thereby confirming previous studies on simple, inanimate tasks. Based on this preliminary work, advanced mentoring technologies, such as 3D ghost tools, stand to improve current telementoring and training technologies in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.
Keywords: Augmented reality; Ghost tools; Performance metrics; Proctor; Surgeon training; Telementoring.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
AM Jarc is a researcher in the Medical Research group at Intuitive Surgical, Inc. IS Gill reports personal fees from EDAP TMS and stock ownership in Hansen Medical, Inc. AJ Hung reports research grants from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. AA Stanley and T Clifford have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Statement of human rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Statement on the welfare of animals
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Figures
References
-
- Santomauro M, Reina GA, Stroup SP, James O. Telementoring in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23(2):141–145. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
