Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul;9(7):53-5.
Epub 2016 Jul 1.

Enhancement of International Dermatologists' Pigmented Skin Lesion Biopsy Decisions Following Dermoscopy with Subsequent Integration of Multispectral Digital Skin Lesion Analysis

Richard R Winkelmann  1 , Aaron S Farberg  2 , Natalie Tucker  3 , Richard White  4 , Darrell S Rigel  5
Affiliations

Enhancement of International Dermatologists' Pigmented Skin Lesion Biopsy Decisions Following Dermoscopy with Subsequent Integration of Multispectral Digital Skin Lesion Analysis

Richard R Winkelmann et al. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Early detection and subsequent management of melanoma are critical for patient survival. New technologies have been developed to augment clinician analysis of suspicious pigmented skin lesions.

Objective: To determine how information provided by a multispectral digital skin lesion analysis device affects the biopsy decisions of international dermatologists following clinical and dermoscopic pigmented skin lesion evaluation.

Methods: Participants at a dermoscopy conference in Vienna, Austria, were shown 12 clinical and dermoscopic images of pigmented skin lesions (2 melanomas in situ, 3 invasive melanomas, and 7 low-grade dysplastic nevi) previously analyzed by multispectral digital skin lesion analysis. Participants were asked if they would biopsy the lesion based on clinical images, again after observing high-resolution dermoscopy images, and again when subsequently shown multispectral digital skin lesion analysis information.

Results: Data were analyzed from a total of 70 international dermatologists. Overall, sensitivity was 58 percent after clinical evaluation (C) and 59 percent post-dermoscopy (D), but 74 percent after multispectral digital skin lesion analysis. Participant specificity was 56 percent (C) decreasing to 51 percent (D), but increasing to 61 percent with multispectral digital skin lesion analysis. Diagnostic accuracy was 57 percent (C) decreasing to 54 percent (D), but increasing to 67 percent for dermatologists after integrating the multispectral digital skin lesion analysis data into the biopsy decision. The overall number of lesions biopsied increased from 50 percent (C) to 53 percent (D), rising to 54 percent after multispectral digital skin lesion analysis.

Conclusion: Decisions to biopsy melanocytic lesions were more sensitive and specific when multispectral digital skin lesion analysis information was provided with no significant increase in the number of biopsies recommended. Providing multispectral digital skin lesion analysis data may lead to additional improvement in biopsy accuracy with a concomitant decrease in the number of nonessential biopsies for pigmented skin lesions even after dermoscopic evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pigmented lesion biopsy decision analysis comparing clinical evaluation, followed by dermoscopy evaluation, and after providing MSDSLA information
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Visual inspection for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults.
    Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Grainge MJ, Chuchu N, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Matin RN, Thomson DR, Wong KY, Aldridge RB, Abbott R, Fawzy M, Bayliss SE, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, Godfrey K, Walter FM, Williams HC; Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Dinnes J, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013194. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30521684 Free PMC article.
  • Computer-assisted diagnosis techniques (dermoscopy and spectroscopy-based) for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.
    Ferrante di Ruffano L, Takwoingi Y, Dinnes J, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Davenport C, Matin RN, Godfrey K, O'Sullivan C, Gulati A, Chan SA, Durack A, O'Connell S, Gardiner MD, Bamber J, Deeks JJ, Williams HC; Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Ferrante di Ruffano L, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013186. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30521691 Free PMC article.
  • Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults.
    Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Chuchu N, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Matin RN, Thomson DR, Wong KY, Aldridge RB, Abbott R, Fawzy M, Bayliss SE, Grainge MJ, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, Godfrey K, Walter FM, Williams HC; Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Dinnes J, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD011902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011902.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30521682 Free PMC article.
  • Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.
    Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Chuchu N, Matin RN, Wong KY, Aldridge RB, Durack A, Gulati A, Chan SA, Johnston L, Bayliss SE, Leonardi-Bee J, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, O'Sullivan C, Tehrani H, Williams HC; Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Dinnes J, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD011901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011901.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30521688 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Rigel DS, Russak J, Friedman R. The evolution of melanoma diagnosis: 25 years beyond the ABCDs. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:301–316. - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1992;268:1314–1319. NIH Consensus Conference: Diagnosis and treatment of early melanoma. - PubMed
    1. Gutkowicz-Krusin D, Elbaum M, Jacobs A, et al. Precision of automatic measurements of pigmented skin lesion parameters with a MelaFind multispectral digital dermoscope. Melanoma Res. 2000;10:563–570. - PubMed
    1. Winkelmann RR, Cockerell CJ, Sober AJ, et al. Integrating evolving technologies into the diagnosis, assessment, and initial management of melanoma: expert panel review. Dermatol Clin. (Submitted 2016).
    1. Elbaum M, Kopf AW, Rabinovitz HS, et al. Automatic differentiation of melanoma and melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: a feasibility study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:207–218. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources