Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 12;138(40):13415-13423.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b08695. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

Evaluation of Chromane-Based Bryostatin Analogues Prepared via Hydrogen-Mediated C-C Bond Formation: Potency Does Not Confer Bryostatin-like Biology

Affiliations

Evaluation of Chromane-Based Bryostatin Analogues Prepared via Hydrogen-Mediated C-C Bond Formation: Potency Does Not Confer Bryostatin-like Biology

John M Ketcham et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

The synthesis and biological evaluation of chromane-containing bryostatin analogues WN-2-WN-7 and the previously reported salicylate-based analogue WN-8 are described. Analogues WN-2-WN-7 are prepared through convergent assembly of the chromane-containing fragment B-I with the "binding domain" fragment A-I or its C26-des-methyl congener, fragment A-II. The synthesis of fragment B-I features enantioselective double C-H allylation of 1,3-propanediol to form the C2-symmetric diol 3 and Heck cyclization of bromo-diene 5 to form the chromane core. The synthesis of salicylate WN-8 is accomplished through the union of fragments A-III and B-II. The highest binding affinities for PKCα are observed for the C26-des-methyl analogues WN-3 (Ki = 63.9 nM) and WN-7 (Ki = 63.1 nM). All analogues, WN-2-WN-8, inhibited growth of Toledo cells, with the most potent analogue being WN-7. This response, however, does not distinguish between phorbol ester-like and bryostatin-like behavior. In contrast, while many of the analogues contain a conserved C-ring in the binding domain and other features common to analogues with bryostatin-like properties, all analogues evaluated in the U937 proliferation and cell attachment assays displayed phorbol ester-like and/or toxic behavior, including WN-8, for which "bryostatin-like PKC modulatory activities" previously was suggested solely on the basis of PKC binding. These results underscore the importance of considering downstream biological effects, as tumor suppression cannot be inferred from potent PKC binding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PKC binding affinity of bryostatin 1 and 7, selected bryostatin analogues and neristatin 1.a aBinding affinity to PKCα. See reference for PKCα binding affinity of bryostatin 1 and bryostatin 7. bCompounds I-V prepared by Wender were reported to function similarly to bryostatin 1 with regard to the pattern of PKCδ-GFP translocation induced in rat basophilic leukemia cells.9h,i,k Binding affinity refers to a mixture of rat brain PKC isozymes. The initially reported binding affinity of I (0,25 nM) has been revised. cFor the indicated Merle bryologs prepared by Keck, PMA-like vs bryostatin-like biology was established via U937 attachment and inhibition of proliferation assays.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Retrosynthetic analysis of WN-7 illustrating C-C bonds formed via hydrogenative coupling.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PKC binding affinity of WN-1 to WN-8.a aBinding affinity to PKCα. See reference for PKCα binding affinity of bryostatin 1 and bryostatin 7. bBinding affinity toward PKCδ and PKCβ, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evaluation of WN-2, WN-3, WN-6, WN-7, and WN-8 in U937 Human Histiocytic Lymphoma Cells.a aSee supporting information for experimental details.
Figure 5
Figure 5
TNFα secretion from U937 cellsa aSee supporting information for experimental details.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Toledo Cell Growth Assaya aSee supporting information for experimental details.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Fragments A-I to A-III via H2-mediated reductive coupling of glyoxal 1a and 1b with 1,3-enyne 2a or 2b.a aThe indicated conditions apply to Fragment A-I. Similar conditions are used for Fragments A-II and A-III. See reference and supporting information for precise experimental details.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Fragment B-I via transfer hydrogenative double allylation of 1,3-propane diol.a aSee supporting information for experimental details.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Synthesis of the chromanone-based macrodiolides WN-2 and WN-4.a aSee supporting information for experimental details.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Synthesis of 1,3-enyne 2b via chelation controlled propargylation.a aSee supporting information for experimental details.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Synthesis of the C26 des-methyl chromanone-based macrodiolides WN-3 and WN-5.a aSee supporting information for experimental details.
Scheme 6
Scheme 6
Synthesis of the C26 des-methyl chromane-based macrodiolide WN-7.a aSee supporting information for experimental details.
Scheme 7
Scheme 7
Synthesis of Fragment B-II.a aSee supporting information for experimental details.
Scheme 8
Scheme 8
Synthesis of previously reported salicylate-based macrodiolide WN-8.a aSee supporting information for experimental details.

References

    1. Pettit GR, Day JF, Hartwell JL, Wood HB. Nature. 1970;227:962.Pettit GR, Herald CL, Doubek DL, Herald DL, Arnold E, Clardy J. J Am Chem Soc. 1982;104:6846.Yu HB, Yang F, Li YY, Gan JH, Jiao WH, Lin HW. J Nat Prod. 2015;78:1169.It is believed that the bryostatins actually derives from a bacterial symbiont of B. neritina: Sudek S, Lopanik NB, Waggoner LE, Hildebrand M, Anderson C, Liu H, Patel A, Sherman DH, Haygood MG. J Nat Prod. 2007;70:67.Linneman J, Paulus D, Lim-Fong G, Lopanik NB. PLoS One. 2014;9:e108783.

    1. For selected studies on the binding of bryostatin 1 to PKC isozymes, see: Berkow RL, Kraft AS. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985;131:1109.Kraft AS, Smith JB, Berkow RL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:1334.Kazanietz MG, Lewin NE, Gao F, Petit GR, Blumberg PM. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;46:374.

    1. For reviews of the chemistry and biology the bryostatins and their analogues, see: Mutter R, Wills M. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2000;8:1841.Hale KJ, Hummersone MG, Manaviazar S, Frigerio M. Nat Prod Rep. 2002;19:413.Kortmansky J, Schwartz GK. Cancer Invest. 2003;21:924.Wender PA, Baryza JL, Hilinski MK, Horan JC, Kan C, Verma VA. In: Drug Discovery Research: New Frontiers in the Post-Genomic Era. Huang Z, editor. Chap 6. Wiley; Hoboken: 2007. p. 127.Hale KJ, Manaviazar S. Chem Asian J. 2010;5:704.Wender PA, Loy BA, Schrier AJ. Isr J Chem. 2011;51:453.Yu L, Krische MJ. In: In Total Synthesis: At the Frontier of Organic Chemistry. Li JJ, Corey EJ, editors. Springer; Heidelberg, Germany: 2013. pp. 103–130.For information on bryostatin 1 in clinical trials for the treatment of cancer, see: (h) http://clinicaltrials.gov.

    1. Berkow RL, Kraft AS. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985;131:1109. - PubMed
    2. De Vries DJ, Herald CL, Pettit GR, Blumberg PM. Biochem Pharmacol. 1988;37:4069. - PubMed
    3. Wender PA, Cribbs CM, Koehler KF, Sharkey NA, Herald CL, Kamano Y, Pettit GR, Blumberg PM. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:7197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schaufelberger DE, Koleck MP, Beutler JA, Vatakis AM, Alvarado AB, Andrews P, Marzo LV, Muschik GM, Roach J, Ross JT, Lebherz WB, Reeves MP, Eberwein RM, Rodgers LL, Testerman RP, Snader KM, Forenza S. J Nat Prod. 1991;54:1265. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources