Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study
- PMID: 27676369
- DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-286OC
Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Rationale: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening in high-risk individuals. Preventive healthcare is provided predominantly by primary care providers (PCPs). Successful implementation of a screening program requires acceptance and participation by both providers and patients, with available collaboration with pulmonologists.
Objectives: To identify perceptions of and perspectives on lung cancer screening and implementation among PCPs and eligible veteran patients at high risk for lung cancer.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using grounded theory in which 28 veterans and 13 PCPs completed a questionnaire and participated in focus groups. Sessions were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with NVivo 10 software. Counts and percentages were used to report questionnaire results.
Measurements and main results: While 58% percent of providers were aware of lung cancer screening guidelines, many could not recall the exact patient eligibility criteria. Most patients were willing to undergo LDCT screening and identified smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer, but they did not recall their PCP explaining the reason for the testing. All providers assessed smoking behavior, but only 23% referred active smokers for formal cessation services. Patients volunteered information regarding their hurdles with smoking cessation while discussing risk factors for cancer. PCPs cited time constraints as a reason for lack of appropriate counseling and shared decision making. Both parties were willing to explore modalities and decision aid tools to improve shared decision making; however, while patients were interested in individual risk prediction, few PCPs believed statistical approaches to counseling would confuse patients.
Conclusions: While patients and providers are receptive to LDCT screening, efforts are needed to improve guideline knowledge and adherence among providers. System-level interventions are necessary to facilitate time and resources for shared decision making and smoking cessation counseling and treatment. Further research is needed to identify optimal strategies for effective lung cancer screening in the community.
Keywords: early detection of cancer; lung neoplasms; shared decision making.
Comment in
-
Opening the Black Box of Communication and Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening and Nodule Evaluation. Implications for Policy and Practice.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1887-1889. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201609-695ED. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016. PMID: 27831805 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
High-risk community and primary care providers knowledge about and barriers to low-dose computed topography lung cancer screening.Lung Cancer. 2017 Apr;106:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 31. Lung Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28285693
-
Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Providers in New Mexico About Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul 9;12:E108. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150112. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015. PMID: 26160294 Free PMC article.
-
Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Apr;24(4):664-70. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1241. Epub 2015 Jan 22. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015. PMID: 25613118 Free PMC article.
-
Low-Dose CT Scan for Lung Cancer Screening: Clinical and Coding Considerations.Chest. 2017 Jul;152(1):204-209. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 21. Chest. 2017. PMID: 28336485 Review.
-
Lung Cancer Screening.Med Clin North Am. 2017 Jul;101(4):769-785. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.03.008. Med Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28577626 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Potential Impact of Cessation Interventions at the Point of Lung Cancer Screening on Lung Cancer and Overall Mortality in the United States.J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Jul;15(7):1160-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Mar 8. J Thorac Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32160967 Free PMC article.
-
Lung cancer screening: targeting the hard to reach-a review.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 May;10(5):2309-2322. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-525. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 34164279 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lung Cancer Screening in People With HIV: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patient and Provider Perspectives.Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):608-617. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 3. Am J Prev Med. 2023. PMID: 37146840 Free PMC article.
-
The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: Current challenges and future directions for shared decision making for lung cancer screening.Cancer. 2024 Dec 1;130(23):3996-4011. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35382. Epub 2024 Sep 20. Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39302231 Review.
-
Lung cancer screening: assessment of health literacy and readability of online educational resources.BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 7;18(1):1356. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6278-8. BMC Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30526544 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical