Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;37(11):3461-3474.
doi: 10.1177/0271678X16665623. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

Neurobehavioral testing in subarachnoid hemorrhage: A review of methods and current findings in rodents

Affiliations
Review

Neurobehavioral testing in subarachnoid hemorrhage: A review of methods and current findings in rodents

Nefize Turan et al. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

The most important aspect of a preclinical study seeking to develop a novel therapy for neurological diseases is whether the therapy produces any clinically relevant functional recovery. For this purpose, neurobehavioral tests are commonly used to evaluate the neuroprotective efficacy of treatments in a wide array of cerebrovascular diseases and neurotrauma. Their use, however, has been limited in experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage studies. After several randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trials repeatedly failed to produce a benefit in functional outcome despite some improvement in angiographic vasospasm, more rigorous methods of neurobehavioral testing became critical to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the functional efficacy of proposed treatments. While several subarachnoid hemorrhage studies have incorporated an array of neurobehavioral assays, a standardized methodology has not been agreed upon. Here, we review neurobehavioral tests for rodents and their potential application to subarachnoid hemorrhage studies. Developing a standardized neurobehavioral testing regimen in rodent studies of subarachnoid hemorrhage would allow for better comparison of results between laboratories and a better prediction of what interventions would produce functional benefits in humans.

Keywords: Animal models; behavior (rodent); cognitive impairment; experimental; subarachnoid hemorrhage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Results of SAH studies using neurological scoring within 72 h in mice. (+ sign denotes list of studies with positive results, − sign denotes list of studies with negative results).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Results of SAH studies using neurological scoring within 72 h in rats. (+ sign denotes list of studies with positive results, − sign denotes list of studies with negative results).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Connolly ES, Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association. Stroke 2012; 43: 171137. - PubMed
    1. Shea AM, Reed SD, Curtis LH, Alexander MJ, Villani JJ, Schulman KA. Characteristics of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the United States in 2003. Neurosurgery 2007; 61: 1131–7. discussion 7–8. - PubMed
    1. Labovitz DL, Halim AX, Brent B, et al. Subarachnoid hemorrhage incidence among Whites, Blacks and Caribbean Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Neuroepidemiology 2006; 26: 147–150. - PubMed
    1. Kirkpatrick PJ, Turner CL, Smith C, et al. Simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (STASH): a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 666–675. - PubMed
    1. Macdonald RL, Higashida RT, Keller E, et al. Randomised trial of clazosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage undergoing surgical clipping (CONSCIOUS-2). Acta Neurochir Suppl 2013; 115: 27– a31. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources