Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Feb;26(2):546-557.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4791-y. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

Treating multi-level cervical disc disease with hybrid surgery compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Treating multi-level cervical disc disease with hybrid surgery compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Victor M Lu et al. Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The traditional surgical approach to treat multi-level cervical disc disease (mCDD) has been anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). There has been recent development of other surgical approaches to further improve clinical outcomes. Collectively, when elements of these different approaches are combined in surgery, it is known as hybrid surgery (HS) which remains a novel treatment option. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes of HS versus ACDF for the treatment of mCDD.

Methods: Relevant articles were identified from six electronic databases from their inception to January 2016.

Results: From 8 relevant studies identified, 169 patients undergoing HS were compared with 193 ACDF procedures. Operative time was greater after HS by 42 min (p < 0.00001), with less intraoperative blood loss by 26 mL (p < 0.00001) and shorter return to work by 32 days (p < 0.00001). In terms of clinical outcomes, HS was associated with greater C2-C7 range of motion (ROM) preservation (p < 0.00001) and less functional impairment (p = 0.008) after surgery compared to ACDF. There was no significant difference between HS and ACDF with respect to postoperative pain (p = 0.12). The postoperative course following HS was not significantly different to ACDF in terms of length of stay (p = 0.24) and postoperative complication rates (p = 0.18).

Conclusions: HS is a novel surgical approach to treat mCDD, associated with a greater operative time, less intraoperative blood loss and comparable if not superior clinical outcomes compared to ACDF. While it remains a viable consideration, there is a lack of robust clinical evidence in the literature. Future large prospective registries and randomised trials are warranted to validate the findings of this study.

Keywords: Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion; Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Arthroplasty; Artificial disc replacement; Cervical disc disease; Hybrid surgery; Multi-level; Range of motion; Spine; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 1;35(7):747-53 - PubMed
    1. J Spinal Disord. 2001 Feb;14 (1):3-9 - PubMed
    1. Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):275-86 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Aug 15;40(16):1277-83 - PubMed
    1. Neurosurg Focus. 2010 May;28(5):E19 - PubMed

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources