Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep 13:7:1452.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01452. eCollection 2016.

New Paradigms for Virus Detection, Surveillance and Control of Zika Virus Vectors in the Settings of Southeast Asia

Affiliations
Review

New Paradigms for Virus Detection, Surveillance and Control of Zika Virus Vectors in the Settings of Southeast Asia

Indra Vythilingam et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) has now become a global public health concern. The vectors for ZIKV are Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus. Both these mosquitoes are predominant in Southeast Asia and are also responsible for the spread of other arboviral diseases like dengue virus and chikungunya virus. The incidence of dengue has been increasing over the years and this is of concern to public health workers. Simple laboratory tools for the detection of ZIKV is also lacking. In the absence of drugs and vaccine for these arboviral diseases, vector control is the main option for surveillance and control. Aedes larval surveys have been the hallmark of dengue control along with larviciding and fogging when cases are reported. However, we need new paradigms and options for control of these vectors. The current situation in Southeast Asia clearly proves that effective strategies for vector control need to be proactive and not reactive. This will be the way forward to control epidemics of these diseases inclusive of ZIKV until a vaccine becomes available.

Keywords: Zika virus; control; diagnostic tools; new paradigms; vectors.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Achee N. L., Gould F., Perkins T. A., Reiner R. C., Jr., Morrison A. C., Ritchie S. A., et al. (2015). A critical assessment of vector control for dengue prevention. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9:e0003655 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003655 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alera M. T., Hermann L., Tac-An I. A., Klungthong C., Rutvisuttinunt W., Manasatienkij W., et al. (2015). Zika virus infection, Philippines, 2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 21 722–724. 10.3201/eid2104.141707 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aumentado C., Cerro B. R., Olobia L., Suy L. L., Reyes A., Kusumawathie P. H., et al. (2015). The prevention and control of dengue after Typhoon Haiyan. Western Pac. Surveill. Response J. 6(Suppl. 1) 60–65. 10.5365/wpsar.2015.6.4.HYN_026 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bingham A. M. (2016). Comparison of test results for Zika virus RNA in urine, serum, and saliva specimens from persons with travel-associated Zika virus disease—Florida, 2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 65 475–478. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6518e2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bishop-Lilly K. A., Turell M. J., Willner K. M., Butani A., Nolan N. M., Lentz S. M., et al. (2010). Arbovirus detection in insect vectors by rapid, high-throughput pyrosequencing. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4:e878 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000878 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources