Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 12;13(2):e20102.
doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.20102. eCollection 2016 Apr.

User Acceptance of Picture Archiving and Communication System in the Emergency Department

Affiliations

User Acceptance of Picture Archiving and Communication System in the Emergency Department

Hassan Goodarzi et al. Iran J Radiol. .

Abstract

Background: Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) has allowed the medical images to be transmitted, stored, retrieved, and displayed in different locations of a hospital or health system. Using PACS in the emergency department will eventually result in improved efficiency and patient care. In spite of the abundant benefits of employing PACS, there are some challenges in implementing this technology like users' resistance to accept the technology, which has a critical role in PACS success.

Objectives: In this study, we will assess and compare user acceptance of PACS in the emergency departments of three different hospitals and investigate the effect of socio-demographic factors on this acceptance.

Materials and methods: A variant of technology acceptance model (TAM) has been used in order to measure the acceptance level of PACS in the emergency department of three educational hospitals in Iran. A previously used questionnaire was validated and utilized to collect the study data. A stepwise multiple regression model was used to predict factors influencing acceptance score as the dependent variable.

Results: Mean age of participants was 32.9 years (standard deviation [SD] = 6.08). Participants with the specialty degree got a higher acceptance score than the three other groups (Mean ± SD = 4.17 ± 0.20). Age, gender, degree of PACS usage and participant's occupation (profession) did not influence the acceptance score. In our multiple regression model, all three variables of perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU) and the effect of PACS (change) had a significant effect in the prediction of acceptance. The most influencing factor was change with the beta of 0.22 (P value < 0.001).

Conclusion: PACS is highly accepted in all three emergency departments especially among specialists. PU, PEU and change are factors influencing PACS acceptance. Our study can be used as an evidence of PACS acceptance in emergency wards.

Keywords: Emergency Service; Hospital; PACS; Radiology Information Systems; TAM; Technology Acceptance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. The technology acceptance model (TAM) of Davis
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Model framework used in this study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. OECD . Improving health sector efficiency: the role of information and communication technologies. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development; 2010.
    1. Blackwell G. The future of IT in healthcare. Inform Health Soc Care. 2008;33(4):211–326. doi: 10.1080/17538150802598860. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inamura K, Kim JH. History of PACS in Asia. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(2):184–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lemke HU. Short history of PACS (Part II: Europe). Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(2):177–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.05.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pare G, Lepanto L, Aubry D, Sicotte C. Toward a multidimensional assessment of picture archiving and communication system success. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(4):471–9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462305050658. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources