Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep;47(5):395-401.
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108533. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

[Strategies for First-Line Treatment of mCRPC]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Strategies for First-Line Treatment of mCRPC]

[Article in German]
K Miller et al. Aktuelle Urol. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

At present, abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are the most commonly used substances in the first-line treatment of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma (mCRPC). Since the relevant pivotal trials have demonstrated comparable clinical efficacy for both substances, further factors should be considered for the choice of treatment. As mCRPC patients usually receive several lines of treatment, different adaptation and resistance mechanisms leading to treatment failure could be important. This is indicated by daily routine observations and some initial clinical studies on resistance and different sequences of therapy. However, until the clinical relevance has been confirmed, it is mostly adverse events and comorbidities that are taken into account for the choice of first-line therapy. Also potential interactions with comedications and patient preferences should be considered. In the first-line treatment of mCRPC, ongoing discussions not only centre around the choice of medication for first-line mCRPC therapy, but also around the point in time they are started. For abiraterone acetate, for example, there is confirmed evidence that patients may benefit from early use within the approved indication. If the clinical importance of the different resistance mechanisms and differences in efficacy of various sequences could be confirmed, this would be a strong argument for therapy decisions and should therefore be further analysed in prospective clinical studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources