Nonconsecutive versus consecutive-day resistance training in recreationally trained subjects
- PMID: 27682004
- DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06660-3
Nonconsecutive versus consecutive-day resistance training in recreationally trained subjects
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown that total-body resistance training (RT) performed two to three alternating days per week has positive effects on muscle strength and body composition. However, no evidence exists to determine if total-body RT workouts done on consecutive days (CD) are beneficial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a total-body RT program performed on three consecutive or nonconsecutive days (NCD) per week for 7 weeks on maximum strength and body composition in recreationally trained subjects.
Methods: Twenty-one men were randomly assigned to a 3NCD (N.=11) or 3CD group (N.=10). Prior and following training, anthropometric measures, and 1 repetition maximum values for leg press, and bench press were measured.
Results: Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase for leg press strength and bench press strength for both groups (P<0.01) from pre to post intervention. There was also a significant increase for arm and chest girth measures (P<0.05) on the 3 CD group. No significant differences between groups were observed.
Conclusions: The results suggest that RT programs performed on three consecutive or nonconsecutive days per week determine similar effects on maximum strength, and body composition.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of two lower-body modes of endurance training on lower-body strength development while concurrently training.J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May;23(3):979-87. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a0629d. J Strength Cond Res. 2009. PMID: 19387377 Clinical Trial.
-
Nonlinear periodization maximizes strength gains in split resistance training routines.J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jul;23(4):1321-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00f96. J Strength Cond Res. 2009. PMID: 19528843 Clinical Trial.
-
Strength, body composition, and functional outcomes in the squat versus leg press exercises.J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018 Mar;58(3):263-270. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06698-6. Epub 2016 Oct 13. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018. PMID: 27735888
-
High-Frequency Resistance Training Is Not More Effective Than Low-Frequency Resistance Training in Increasing Muscle Mass and Strength in Well-Trained Men.J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S130-S139. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559. J Strength Cond Res. 2019. PMID: 29489727
-
Effects of different resistance training volumes on strength and power in team sport athletes.J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jul;27(7):1832-40. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182736d10. J Strength Cond Res. 2013. PMID: 23044934 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Consecutive Versus Non-consecutive Days of Resistance Training on Strength, Body Composition, and Red Blood Cells.Front Physiol. 2018 Jun 18;9:725. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00725. eCollection 2018. Front Physiol. 2018. PMID: 29967584 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources