Delivering risk information in a dynamic information environment: Framing and authoritative voice in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and primetime broadcast news media communications during the 2014 Ebola outbreak
- PMID: 27682022
- PMCID: PMC7116921
- DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.029
Delivering risk information in a dynamic information environment: Framing and authoritative voice in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and primetime broadcast news media communications during the 2014 Ebola outbreak
Abstract
Objective: During a disease outbreak, media serve as primary transmitters of information from public health agencies to the public, and have been shown to influence both behavior and perception of risk. Differences in news frequency, framing and information source can impact the public's interpretation of risk messages and subsequent attitudes and behaviors about a particular threat. The media's framing of an outbreak is important, as it may affect both perception of risk and the ability to process important health information.
Methods: To understand how risk communication by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the 2014 Ebola outbreak was framed and delivered and to what extent primetime broadcast news media mirrored CDC's framing and authoritative voice, 209 CDC communications and primetime broadcast transcripts issued between July 24 and December 29, 2014 were analyzed and coded by thematic frame and authoritative voice. Dominant frame and voice were determined for each month and for overall period of analysis.
Results: Medical frame was dominant in CDC (60%), Anderson Cooper 360 (49%), The Rachel Maddow Show (47%) and All In with Chris Hayes (47%). The human interest frame was dominant in The Kelly File (45%), while The O'Reilly Factor coverage was equally split between sociopolitical and medical frames (28%, respectively). Primetime news media also changed dominant frames over time. Dominant authoritative voice in CDC communications was that of CDC officials, while primetime news dominantly featured local and federal (non-CDC) government officials and academic/medical experts.
Conclusion: Differences in framing and delivery could have led the public to interpret risk in a different way than intended by CDC. Overall, public health agencies should consider adapting risk communication strategies to account for a dynamic news environment and the media's agenda. Options include adapting communications to short-form styles and embracing the concept of storytelling.
Keywords: Content analysis; Disease outbreaks; Ebola; Media; Preparedness; Risk communication.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Health Risk Information Engagement and Amplification on Social Media.Health Educ Behav. 2017 Apr;44(2):332-339. doi: 10.1177/1090198116660310. Epub 2016 Jul 19. Health Educ Behav. 2017. PMID: 27413028
-
News media coverage of U.S. Ebola policies: Implications for communication during future infectious disease threats.Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Sep 21. Prev Med. 2016. PMID: 27664539
-
Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak.BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32375715 Free PMC article.
-
Overview, Control Strategies, and Lessons Learned in the CDC Response to the 2014-2016 Ebola Epidemic.MMWR Suppl. 2016 Jul 8;65(3):4-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6503a2. MMWR Suppl. 2016. PMID: 27389903 Review.
-
CDC's Response to the 2014-2016 Ebola Epidemic - Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.MMWR Suppl. 2016 Jul 8;65(3):12-20. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6503a3. MMWR Suppl. 2016. PMID: 27388930 Review.
Cited by
-
Investigation into Information Release of Chinese Government and Departments on COVID-19.Data Inf Manag. 2020 Sep 1;4(3):209-235. doi: 10.2478/dim-2020-0014. Epub 2022 Mar 31. Data Inf Manag. 2020. PMID: 35382098 Free PMC article.
-
Information uncertainty: a correlate for acute stress disorder during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1867. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09952-3. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33287780 Free PMC article.
-
Infectious diseases risk framing in Bulgarian media during early COVID-19 pandemic and the Ebola crisis.Heliyon. 2024 Aug 20;10(17):e36575. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36575. eCollection 2024 Sep 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39281583 Free PMC article.
-
Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare.Health Secur. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):3-12. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0038. Epub 2020 Oct 22. Health Secur. 2021. PMID: 33090030 Free PMC article.
-
"Let's get back to normal": emotions mediate the effects of persuasive messages on willingness to vaccinate for COVID-19.Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1377973. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377973. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38756873 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Althaus S., Kim Y.M. Priming effects in complex information environments: reassessing the impact of news discourse on presidential approval. J. Polit. 2006;68(4):960–976.
-
- Altheide D.L. The news media, the problem frame, and the production of fear. Sociol. Q. 1997;38(4):647–668.
-
- Baron J., Hershey J.C., Kunreuther H. Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry. Risk Anal. 2000;20(4):413–428. - PubMed
-
- Berelson B. The Free Press; 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research.
-
- Berry T.R., Wharf-Higgins J., Naylor P. j. SARS wars: an examination of the quantity and construction of health information in the news media. Health Commun. 2007;21(1):35–44. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical