Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov:169:42-49.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.029. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

Delivering risk information in a dynamic information environment: Framing and authoritative voice in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and primetime broadcast news media communications during the 2014 Ebola outbreak

Affiliations

Delivering risk information in a dynamic information environment: Framing and authoritative voice in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and primetime broadcast news media communications during the 2014 Ebola outbreak

Anne Kott et al. Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: During a disease outbreak, media serve as primary transmitters of information from public health agencies to the public, and have been shown to influence both behavior and perception of risk. Differences in news frequency, framing and information source can impact the public's interpretation of risk messages and subsequent attitudes and behaviors about a particular threat. The media's framing of an outbreak is important, as it may affect both perception of risk and the ability to process important health information.

Methods: To understand how risk communication by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the 2014 Ebola outbreak was framed and delivered and to what extent primetime broadcast news media mirrored CDC's framing and authoritative voice, 209 CDC communications and primetime broadcast transcripts issued between July 24 and December 29, 2014 were analyzed and coded by thematic frame and authoritative voice. Dominant frame and voice were determined for each month and for overall period of analysis.

Results: Medical frame was dominant in CDC (60%), Anderson Cooper 360 (49%), The Rachel Maddow Show (47%) and All In with Chris Hayes (47%). The human interest frame was dominant in The Kelly File (45%), while The O'Reilly Factor coverage was equally split between sociopolitical and medical frames (28%, respectively). Primetime news media also changed dominant frames over time. Dominant authoritative voice in CDC communications was that of CDC officials, while primetime news dominantly featured local and federal (non-CDC) government officials and academic/medical experts.

Conclusion: Differences in framing and delivery could have led the public to interpret risk in a different way than intended by CDC. Overall, public health agencies should consider adapting risk communication strategies to account for a dynamic news environment and the media's agenda. Options include adapting communications to short-form styles and embracing the concept of storytelling.

Keywords: Content analysis; Disease outbreaks; Ebola; Media; Preparedness; Risk communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequency of Communication. Frequency of Ebola communications issued by Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and primetime broadcast news shows.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency of Thematic Frame. Frequency of thematic frames used by Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and primetime broadcast news shows in Ebola communications.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency of Authoritative Voice. Frequency of authoritative voice used by Centers for Disease Control (CDC) primetime broadcast news shows in Ebola communications.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Dominant Thematic Frame and Authoritative Voice, By Month. Monthly distribution of dominant thematic frames and authoritative voices used by Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and primetime broadcast news shows in Ebola communications.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Althaus S., Kim Y.M. Priming effects in complex information environments: reassessing the impact of news discourse on presidential approval. J. Polit. 2006;68(4):960–976.
    1. Altheide D.L. The news media, the problem frame, and the production of fear. Sociol. Q. 1997;38(4):647–668.
    1. Baron J., Hershey J.C., Kunreuther H. Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry. Risk Anal. 2000;20(4):413–428. - PubMed
    1. Berelson B. The Free Press; 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research.
    1. Berry T.R., Wharf-Higgins J., Naylor P. j. SARS wars: an examination of the quantity and construction of health information in the news media. Health Commun. 2007;21(1):35–44. - PubMed

MeSH terms