Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk: systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 27683246
- PMCID: PMC5040923
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5130
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk: systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To examine the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical replacement of an aortic valve (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk of perioperative death.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL.
Study selection: Randomized trials of TAVI compared with SAVR in patients with a mean perioperative risk of death <8%.
Review methods: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for outcomes important to patients that were selected a priori by a parallel guideline committee, including patient advisors. We used the GRADE system was used to quantify absolute effects and quality of evidence.
Results: 4 trials with 3179 patients and a median follow-up of two years were included. Compared with SAVR, transfemoral TAVI was associated with reduced mortality (risk difference per 1000 patients: -30, 95% confidence interval -49 to -8, moderate certainty), stroke (-20, -37 to 1, moderate certainty), life threatening bleeding (-252, -293 to -190, high certainty), atrial fibrillation (-178, -150 to -203, moderate certainty), and acute kidney injury (-53, -39 to -62, high certainty) but increased short term aortic valve reintervention (7, 1 to 21, moderate certainty), permanent pacemaker insertion (134, 16 to 382, moderate certainty), and moderate or severe symptoms of heart failure (18, 5 to 34, moderate certainty). Compared with SAVR, transapical TAVI was associated higher mortality (57, -16 to 153, moderate certainty, P=0.015 for interaction between transfemoral versus transapical TAVI) and stroke (45, -2 to 125, moderate certainty, interaction P=0.012). No study reported long term follow-up, which is particularly important for structural valve deterioration.
Conclusions: Many patients, particularly those who have a shorter life expectancy or place a lower value on the risk of long term valve degeneration, are likely to perceive net benefit with transfemoral TAVI versus SAVR. SAVR, however, performs better than transapical TAVI, which is of interest to patients who are not candidates for transfemoral TAVI.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016042879.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 20;12(12):CD013319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013319.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31860123 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 14;37(47):3503-3512. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225. Epub 2016 Jul 7. Eur Heart J. 2016. PMID: 27389906
-
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low and intermediate risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score matching observational studies.J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1945-1962. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.97. J Thorac Dis. 2019. PMID: 31285888 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low and intermediate risk: A risk specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0221922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221922. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31550263 Free PMC article.
-
Transfemoral, transapical and transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of early and mid-term deaths.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;25(3):484-492. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx150. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017. PMID: 28549125 Review.
Cited by
-
Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model of Aortic Valve Replacement Modality Selection in Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients.Med Sci (Basel). 2023 Dec 29;12(1):3. doi: 10.3390/medsci12010003. Med Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38249079 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal Trend, Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Pericardial Diseases in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Repair.Cureus. 2021 Jul 1;13(7):e16083. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16083. eCollection 2021 Jul. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34249583 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating long-term outcomes and the impact of small aortic annulus on valve replacement-a novel systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgery vs. transcatheter interventions.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 26;12:1555853. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1555853. eCollection 2025. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 40642752 Free PMC article.
-
Rates, predictors, and causes of readmission after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic kidney disease.World J Cardiol. 2024 Jul 26;16(7):402-411. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i7.402. World J Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 39086887 Free PMC article.
-
From Rapid Recommendation to Online Preference-Sensitive Decision Support: The Case of Severe Aortic Stenosis.Med Sci (Basel). 2018 Nov 29;6(4):109. doi: 10.3390/medsci6040109. Med Sci (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30501062 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Turina J, Hess O, Sepulcri F, Krayenbuehl HP. Spontaneous course of aortic valve disease. Eur Heart J 1987;8:471-83.pmid:3609042. - PubMed
-
- HCUPnet. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [Available from: http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/. - PubMed
-
- Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006;368:1005-11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8 pmid:16980116. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Holmes DR Jr, , Nishimura RA, Grover FL, et al. STS/ACC TVT Registry. Annual Outcomes With Transcatheter Valve Therapy: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2813-23. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.021 pmid:26652232. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J 2012;33:2451-96. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109 pmid:22922415. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources