Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep 28;283(1839):20161329.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1329.

Hybridization as a facilitator of species range expansion

Affiliations
Review

Hybridization as a facilitator of species range expansion

Karin S Pfennig et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Explaining the evolution of species geographical ranges is fundamental to understanding how biodiversity is distributed and maintained. The solution to this classic problem in ecology and evolution remains elusive: we still do not fully know how species geographical ranges evolve and what factors fuel range expansions. Resolving this problem is now more crucial than ever with increasing biodiversity loss, global change and movement of species by humans. Here, we describe and evaluate the hypothesis that hybridization between species can contribute to species range expansion. We discuss how such a process can occur and the empirical data that are needed to test this hypothesis. We also examine how species can expand into new environments via hybridization with a resident species, and yet remain distinct species. Generally, hybridization may play an underappreciated role in influencing the evolution of species ranges. Whether-and to what extent-hybridization has such an effect requires further study across more diverse taxa.

Keywords: adaptation; admixture; hybridization; introgression; invasive species; range expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Hybridization can promote range expansion via its genetic effects. (a) Two species of fish (indicated by the different shapes and genotypes) that occupy different habitats (differential shading) hybridize and produce viable and fertile F1 offspring, which (b) later backcross to one parental species. (c) As a result of introgression, one of the parental species acquires an allele (indicated as ‘a’) that enables adaptation and expansion into the other environment. Allele ‘a’ could encode for a key functional trait that is already adaptive in that environment. Alternatively, allele ‘a’ could represent additional genetic variation that interacts with other loci to take the species to a different adaptive optimum for that environment (see text).

References

    1. Bridle JR, Vines TH. 2007. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 140–147. (10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.002) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barton NH. 2001. Adaptation at the edge of a species’ range. In Integrating ecology and evolution in a spatial context (eds Silvertown J, Antonovics J), pp. 365–392. New York, NY: Blackwell.
    1. Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH. 1997. Evolution of a species’ range. Am. Nat. 150, 1–23. (10.1086/286054) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holt RD, Keitt TH. 2000. Alternative causes for range limits: a metapopulation perspective. Ecol. Lett. 3, 41–47. (10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00116.x) - DOI
    1. Sexton JP, McIntyre PJ, Angert AL, Rice KJ. 2009. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. pp. 415–436.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources