Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Nov;146(11):2325-2333.
doi: 10.3945/jn.116.237644. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

Cocoa Flavanol Intake and Biomarkers for Cardiometabolic Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cocoa Flavanol Intake and Biomarkers for Cardiometabolic Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Xiaochen Lin et al. J Nutr. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Cocoa flavanols may improve cardiometabolic health. Evidence from small short-term randomized clinical trials (RCTs) remains inconsistent, and large long-term RCTs testing the efficacy of cocoa flavanols are still lacking.

Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to quantify the effect of cocoa flavanol intake on cardiometabolic biomarkers.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs that evaluated the effects of cocoa flavanols on biomarkers relevant to vascular disease pathways among adults. Data were extracted following a standardized protocol. We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models to compute the weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% CIs. We also examined potential modification by intervention duration, design, age, sex, comorbidities, and the form and amount of cocoa flavanol intake.

Results: We included 19 RCTs that comprised 1131 participants, and the number of studies for a specific biomarker varied. The amount of cocoa flavanols ranged from 166 to 2110 mg/d, and intervention duration ranged from 2 to 52 wk. Cocoa flavanol intake significantly improved insulin sensitivity and lipid profile. The WMDs between treatment and placebo were -0.10 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.16, -0.04 mmol/L) for total triglycerides, 0.06 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.02, 0.09 mmol/L) for HDL cholesterol, -2.33 μIU/mL (95% CI: -3.47, -1.19 μIU/mL) for fasting insulin, -0.93 (95% CI: -1.31, -0.55) for the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.05) for the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, 2.54 (95% CI: 0.63, 4.44) for the insulin sensitivity index, -0.83 mg/dL (95% CI: -0.88, -0.77 mg/dL) for C-reactive protein, and 85.6 ng/mL (95% CI: 16.0, 155 ng/mL) for vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. No significant associations were found for other biomarkers. None of the modifiers seemed to qualitatively modify the effects of cocoa flavanol intake.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that cocoa flavanol intake has favorable effects on select cardiometabolic biomarkers among adults. These findings support the need for large long-term RCTs to assess whether cocoa flavanol intake reduces the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular events.

Keywords: biomarkers; cardiometabolic health; cocoa flavanols; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

2 Author disclosures: X Lin, I Zhang, A Li, and S Liu, no conflicts of interest. JE Manson, HD Sesso, and L Wang received support from Mars Symbioscience for investigator-initiated clinical trial testing cocoa flavanols.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of the study selection of 19 RCTs eligible for the meta-analysis. In total, 326 articles were identified that evaluated the effect of cocoa flavanols on cardiometabolic biomarkers. We excluded 239 articles after abstract review and 68 after full-text examination. After exclusion, 19 RCTs (n = 1131) were included in the meta-analysis. RCT, randomized control trial.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Assessment of the risk of bias for 19 selected randomized control trials: summary for items of bias. (A) Risk of bias for all trials included in the meta-analysis presented for individual trials (represented by author name and year) as low, high, or unclear risk of bias in each assessment item; (B) risk of bias for all trials included in the meta-analysis presented as the percentages of trials with low, high, or unclear risk of bias in each assessment item.

Comment in

References

    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, et al. . Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014;129:e28–292. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones DS, Greene JA. The decline and rise of coronary heart disease: understanding public health catastrophism. Am J Public Health 2013;103:1207–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Z, Xu G, Liu X. Chocolate intake reduces risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence from 10 observational studies. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:5448–50. - PubMed
    1. Grassi D, Desideri G, Necozione S, Lippi C, Casale R, Properzi G, Blumberg JB, Ferri C. Blood pressure is reduced and insulin sensitivity increased in glucose-intolerant, hypertensive subjects after 15 days of consuming high-polyphenol dark chocolate. J Nutr 2008;138:1671–6. - PubMed
    1. Gu Y, Lambert JD. Modulation of metabolic syndrome-related inflammation by cocoa. Mol Nutr Food Res 2013;57:948–61. - PubMed