Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Moving Towards a Better Understanding of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Preventive Health Care Use: A Life Course Perspective

In: A Life Course Perspective on Health Trajectories and Transitions [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2015. Chapter 6.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Moving Towards a Better Understanding of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Preventive Health Care Use: A Life Course Perspective

Sarah Missinne.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

The aim of this book chapter is to outline how the life course perspective can move forward the debate on socioeconomic inequalities in preventive health care use. Recent theoretical developments in medical sociology, including health lifestyle theory and cultural health capital theory, have implicitly encapsulated a longer-term view of an individual’s life, in order to develop a better understanding of the social causes of good health and conversely illness. I will elaborate more explicitly on how the five central principles of the life course perspective apply to preventive health care use, using the empirical example of mammography screening. Central and unanswered questions pertain to (i) the life stages that are important in the development of cultural health capital or a healthy lifestyle (life-span development); (ii) the temporality of socioeconomic inequalities in preventive health care (timing); (iii) the impact of different socialization contexts for healthy lifestyles or cultural health capital (structure-agency debate); (iv) the change in preventive health care use across policy implementations (time and place); and (v) the role of significant others for health care use (linked lives).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abel, T. (2008). Cultural capital and social inequality in health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 1–5. - PubMed
    1. Abel, T., & Frohlich, K. L. (2012). Capitals and capabilities: Linking structure and agency to reduce health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.028:236–244. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral-model and access to medical-care – Does It matter. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 1–10. - PubMed
    1. Andersen, R. M., Smedby, B., & Anderson, O. W. (1970). Medical care use in Sweden and the united states – A comparative analysis of systems and behavior. Chicago: Centre for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago.
    1. Bartley, M., & Plewis, I. (2007). Increasing social mobility: An effective policy to reduce health inequalities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society, 170, 469–481.

LinkOut - more resources