The Diversity and Prevalence of Sexual Orientation Self-Labels in a New Zealand National Sample
- PMID: 27686089
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-016-0857-5
The Diversity and Prevalence of Sexual Orientation Self-Labels in a New Zealand National Sample
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to: The Diversity and Prevalence of Sexual Orientation Self-Labels in a New Zealand National Sample (Greaves et al., 2017).Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Nov;46(8):2209-2210. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1063-9. Epub 2017 Sep 12. Arch Sex Behav. 2017. PMID: 28900760 No abstract available.
Abstract
In this study, we asked participants to "describe their sexual orientation" in an open-ended measure of self-generated sexual orientation. The question was included as part of the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (N = 18,261) 2013/2014 wave, a national probability survey conducted shortly after the first legal same-sex marriages in New Zealand. We present a two-level classification scheme to address questions about the prevalence of, and demographic differences between, sexual orientations. At the most detailed level of the coding scheme, 49 unique categories were generated by participant responses. Of those who responded with the following, significantly more were women: bisexual (2.1 % of women, compared to 1.5 % of men), bicurious (0.7 % of women, 0.4 % of men), and asexual (0.4 % of women and less than 0.1 % of men). However, significantly fewer women than men reported being lesbian or gay (1.8 % of women, compared to 3.5 % of men). Those openly identifying as bicurious, bisexual, or lesbian/gay were significantly younger than those with a heterosexual orientation. This study shows diversity in the terms used in self-generated sexual orientations, and provides up-to-date gender, age, and prevalence estimates for the New Zealand population. Finally, results reveal that a substantial minority of participants may not have understood the question about sexual orientation.
Keywords: Asexuality; Heteronormativity; Heterosexuality; Pansexuality; Sexual identity; Sexual orientation.
Comment in
-
Response to Greaves et al.'s (2017) "The Diversity and Prevalence of Sexual Orientation Self-Labels in a New Zealand National Sample".Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Nov;46(8):2207-2208. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1047-9. Epub 2017 Aug 2. Arch Sex Behav. 2017. PMID: 28770410 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
