Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Feb;151(2):329-339.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Lobectomies

Lise N Tchouta  1 , Henry S Park  2 , Daniel J Boffa  1 , Justin D Blasberg  1 , Frank C Detterbeck  1 , Anthony W Kim  3
Affiliations
Observational Study

Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Lobectomies

Lise N Tchouta et al. Chest. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The positive impact of hospital operative volume on outcomes following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has been established. The goal of this study was to determine whether or not this volume/outcome relationship translates to robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RobATS) lobectomy.

Methods: Patients who underwent RobATS lobectomy were identified between 2008 and 2013 in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database. Hospital volume, as well as demographic, clinical, and health-care system-related factors were selected as potential predictors of outcomes. Outcome variables included length of stay (LOS), inpatient mortality, and complications. Hospitals were designated by quartiles according to annual case volume, with very low-volume defined as the first quartile and high-volume defined as the fourth quartile. Regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of the outcomes of interest.

Results: A total of 8,253 RobATS lobectomies were identified. Compared with very low-volume centers, patients at high-volume hospitals had a shorter mean LOS (5.8 vs 6.5 days; P = .001) and decreased mortality rate (0.5% vs 1.9%; P < .001) but more complications (28.1% vs 27.6%; P = .025). In multivariable analysis, high hospital volume was prognostic for decreased mortality (OR, 0.134; P< .001) and shorter LOS (0.2 days; SE, 0.05; P<.001). Hospital volume was not prognostic for any complications, including pulmonary, cardiovascular, intraoperative, or infectious complications.

Conclusions: Undergoing lobectomy at high-volume RobATS centers confers favorable mortality and LOS outcomes compared with very low-volume centers. In this relatively early phase of adoption of RobATS, the long-term clinical impact of differences in LOS as well as the lack of clinical impact on the incidence of complications remain to be determined more definitively. However, the beneficial effect of volume on mortality suggests a need for the careful adoption of this promising technology.

Keywords: complications; lobectomy; lung cancer; outcomes; robotic thoracic surgery; volume.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Doing More and Doing Better in Robotic Thoracic Surgery.
    Novellis P, Veronesi G, Alloisio M. Novellis P, et al. Chest. 2017 Apr;151(4):941-942. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.059. Chest. 2017. PMID: 28390632 No abstract available.
  • Response.
    Tchouta LN, Park HS, Boffa DJ, Blasberg JD, Detterbeck FC, Kim AW. Tchouta LN, et al. Chest. 2017 Apr;151(4):942-943. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.01.017. Chest. 2017. PMID: 28390633 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms