Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 29;6(9):e012353.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012353.

Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review

Affiliations

Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review

Catherine Hudon et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Frequent users of healthcare services are a vulnerable population, often socioeconomically disadvantaged, who can present multiple chronic conditions as well as mental health problems. Case management (CM) is the most frequently performed intervention to reduce healthcare use and cost. This study aimed to examine the evidence of the effectiveness of CM interventions for frequent users of healthcare services.

Design: Scoping review.

Data sources: An electronic literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL databases covering January 2004 to December 2015. A specific search strategy was developed for each database using keywords 'case management' and 'frequent use'.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: To be included in the review, studies had to report effects of a CM intervention on healthcare use and cost or patient outcomes. Eligible designs included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and controlled and non-controlled before-after studies. Studies limited to specific groups of patients or targeting a single disease were excluded. Three reviewers screened abstracts, screened each full-text article and extracted data, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

Results: The final review included 11 articles evaluating the effectiveness of CM interventions among frequent users of healthcare services. Two non-randomised controlled studies and 4 before-after studies reported positives outcomes on healthcare use or cost. Two randomised controlled trials, 2 before-after studies and 1 non-randomised controlled study presented mitigated results. Patient outcomes such as drug and alcohol use, health locus of control, patient satisfaction and psychological functioning were evaluated in 3 studies, but no change was reported.

Conclusions: Many studies suggest that CM could reduce emergency department visits and hospitalisations as well as cost. However, pragmatic randomised controlled trials of adequate power that recruit the most frequent users of healthcare services are still needed to clearly confirm its effectiveness.

Keywords: case management; effectiveness; health services research; outcome assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scoping review flow chart of search results.

References

    1. Bodenheimer T, Berry-Millett R. Follow the money—controlling expenditures by improving care for patients needing costly services. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1521–3. 10.1056/NEJMp0907185 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Department of Health. Supporting people with long term conditions: an NHS and social care model to support local innovation and integration. UK: Department of Health, 2005.
    1. Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services. Public services for Ontarians: a path to sustainability and excellence. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2012.
    1. Althaus F, Paroz S, Hugli O et al. Effectiveness of interventions targeting frequent users of emergency departments: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med 2011;58:41–52.e42. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumar GS, Klein R. Effectiveness of case management strategies in reducing emergency department visits in frequent user patient populations: a systematic review. J Emerg Med 2013;44:717–29. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.035 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources