Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;49(4):309-15.
doi: 10.15644/asc49/4/6.

The Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Salivation

Affiliations

The Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Salivation

Nikolina Petrušić et al. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the detrimental effect of smoking on the function of the salivary glands.

Material and methods: The study was conducted on 60 patients who were divided into two groups: a test group which included smokers and control group represented by non-smokers. Each group included 30 patients. General information was collected from all the respondents via a questionnaire as well as the data on the duration of smoking and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Saliva was collected by spitting method in a graduated tube and the amount of unstimulated and stimulated saliva was measured and recorded in ml per minute. Stimulated saliva was collected immediately after rinsing the mouth with a 2% aqueous solution of citric acid which is carried salivary stimulation. The presence of pigmentation on the teeth and coated tongue were recorded during clinical examination. The degree of oral hygiene was determined by plaque index. All the obtained data were statistically analyzed with significance level p <0.05.

Results: The results showed no significant differences in the amount of saliva between smokers and non-smokers, however, the amount of saliva decreases significantly with the duration of smoking and increasing age of smokers. Also proven was the difference in the quality of saliva: smokers have thick saliva and nonsmokers predominantly serous. In addition, smokers have poorer oral hygiene status than non-smokers, and demonstrated a positive correlation between the level of oral hygiene and length of smoking tobacco.

Conclusion: This study has proven that smoking adversely affects salivation: long-term smoking reduces the secretion of saliva and changes its quality.

Keywords: Saliva; Salivation; Smoking; Tobacco Use Disorder; Xerostomia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quantity of unstimulated (Qns) and stimulated (Qss) saliva between smokers and non-smokers
Figure 2
Figure 2
Difference in the quantity of unstimulated and stimulated saliva among smokers and non-smokers of different age
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of duration of smoking and quantity of saliva (unstimulated and stimulated) among smokers
Figure 4
Figure 4
Quantity of unstimulated (Qns) and stimulated (Qss) saliva in smokers who took medications and those who did not take medications
Figure 5
Figure 5
Quantity of unstimulated (Qns) and stimulated (Qss)saliva in non-smokers who took medications and those who did not take medications

References

    1. Lenander-Lumikari M, Loimaranta V. Saliva and dental caries. Adv Dent Res. 2000;14:40–7. 10.1177/08959374000140010601 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Navazesh M. Methods for collecting saliva. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;694:72–7. [NIJE U] 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb18343.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fenoll-Palomares C, Muńoz-Montagud JV, Sanchiz V, Herreros B, Hernández V, Mínguez M, et al. Unstimulated salivary flow rate, pH and buffer capacity of saliva in healthy volunteers. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2004. Nov;96(11):773–83. 10.4321/S1130-01082004001100005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condtion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964;22:121–35. 10.3109/00016356408993968 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan GJ, Muhammad J, Muhammad I. Effect of smoking on salivary flow rate. Gomal J Med Sci. 2010;8(2):221–4.

LinkOut - more resources