Clinical outcomes of single versus double blastocyst transfer in fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles
- PMID: 27689039
- PMCID: PMC5039309
- DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.164
Clinical outcomes of single versus double blastocyst transfer in fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles
Abstract
Objective: Assisted reproductive technology has been associated with an increase in multiple pregnancies. The most effective strategy for reducing multiple pregnancies is single embryo transfer. Beginning in October 2015, the National Supporting Program for Infertility in South Korea has limited the number of embryos that can be transferred per in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle depending on the patient's age. However, little is known regarding the effect of age and number of transferred embryos on the clinical outcomes of Korean patients. Thus, this study was performed to evaluate the effect of the number of transferred blastocysts on clinical outcomes.
Methods: This study was carried out in the Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center from January 2013 to December 2014. The clinical outcomes of 514 women who underwent the transfer of one or two blastocysts on day 5 after IVF and of 721 women who underwent the transfer of one or two vitrified-warmed blastocysts were analyzed retrospectively.
Results: For both fresh and vitrified-warmed cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth or ongoing pregnancy rate were not significantly different between patients who underwent elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT) and patients who underwent double blastocyst transfer (DBT), regardless of age. However, the multiple pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the eSBT group than in the DBT group.
Conclusion: The clinical outcomes of eSBT and DBT were equivalent, but eSBT had a lower risk of multiple pregnancy and is, therefore, the best option.
Keywords: Blastocyst transfer; In vitro fertilization; Live birth pregnancy rate; Multiple pregnancy; Single embryo transfer.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Similar articles
-
Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome.Fertil Steril. 2008 Jun;89(6):1702-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.036. Epub 2007 Jul 20. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17644095
-
Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Jun;34(6):741-748. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0906-6. Epub 2017 Mar 15. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017. PMID: 28299549 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1685-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew127. Epub 2016 Jun 6. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27270972
-
Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Aug;102(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.01.007. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008. PMID: 18773532 Review.
-
Multi-chorionic pregnancies following single embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage: a case series and review of the literature.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Dec;35(12):2109-2117. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1329-8. Epub 2018 Oct 25. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018. PMID: 30362060 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
[Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of elective single versus double cleavage-stage embryo transfer].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016 Apr 20;37(4):512-516. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.04.15. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016. PMID: 28446405 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Extended culture of poor-quality supernumerary embryos improves ART outcomes.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Feb;35(2):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1063-7. Epub 2017 Oct 18. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018. PMID: 29047006 Free PMC article.
-
Live birth rate and neonatal outcomes of different quantities and qualities of frozen transferred blastocyst in patients requiring whole embryo freezing stratified by age.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 29;20(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03353-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 33121448 Free PMC article.
-
Determining Factors Affecting the Successful Outcome of Fresh Embryo Transfer During In Vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.J Reprod Infertil. 2024 Oct-Dec;25(4):253-263. doi: 10.18502/jri.v25i4.18123. J Reprod Infertil. 2024. PMID: 40352444 Free PMC article.
-
One Plus One Is Better Than Two: Cumulative Reproductive Outcomes Are Better after Two Elective Single Blastocyst Embryo Transfers Compared to One Double Blastocyst Embryo Transfer.J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):161-168. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_117_17. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018. PMID: 30158813 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ministry of Health and Welfare. A study for the improvement of sub-fertility couple supporting program [Internet] Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2013. [cited 2013 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.prism.go.kr/
-
- Van Voorhis BJ. Clinical practice: in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:379–386. - PubMed
-
- Statistics Korea. Final results of birth statistics in 2014 [Internet] Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2015. [cited 2015 August 25]. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/
-
- Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:731–737. - PubMed
-
- D'Angelo DV, Whitehead N, Helms K, Barfield W, Ahluwalia IB. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:314–320.e2. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources