Binocular interactions in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Spatial-frequency analysis of responses of X, Y, and W cells to nondominant-eye stimulation
- PMID: 2769345
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.1989.62.2.526
Binocular interactions in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Spatial-frequency analysis of responses of X, Y, and W cells to nondominant-eye stimulation
Abstract
1. X, Y, and W cells in the A and C layers of the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were tested for responses to stimulation of the nondominant eye. The main purpose was to determine the incidence of nondominant-eye excitation and inhibition among different classes of cells and to examine the spatial-frequency tuning of responses to the nondominant eye. 2. Of 198 cells that were tested with drifting sine-wave gratings presented to the nondominant eye, 109 (55%) showed statistically significant responses. Four types of responses were observed: an increase in the mean discharge rate (F0 excitation), a decrease in the mean discharge rate (F0 inhibition), an increased modulation at the fundamental frequency of the grating (F1 excitation), and a decreased modulation at the fundamental frequency of the grating (F1 inhibition). Overall, 29% of the cells responded with inhibition, 24% responded with excitation, and 2% showed both excitation and inhibition, depending upon the spatial frequency and/or the harmonic response component. The relative incidence of excitation and inhibition was similar for X, Y, and W cells, for cells with on-center and off-center receptive fields, for cells with different receptive-field eccentricities, and for cells in each LGN layer. In addition, within layers A and A1, responses were similar for cells at different distances from the laminar borders. 3. Spatial-frequency response functions indicated that cells could have band-pass or low-pass spatial-frequency tuning through the nondominant eye. Band-pass cells tended to be narrowly tuned (less than or equal to 1 octave), and low-pass cells responded to a broader range of spatial frequencies. These properties were similar for X, Y, and W cells. Spatial resolution tended to be low (less than or equal to 0.8 c/deg for most cells), although a few cells responded to the highest spatial frequency tested (5.4 c/deg). Likewise, optimal spatial frequency was low (less than or equal to 0.2 c/deg) for most cells. These properties were similar for X and Y cells, and there was a weak tendency for X and Y cells to have higher optimal spatial frequencies and spatial resolutions than W cells. 4. In terms of absolute change in activity, responses to drifting gratings were weak. However, cells that were inhibited generally showed 20-60% decreases in activity to the optimal spatial frequency, and cells that were excited generally showed 40-100% increases. Response amplitudes were similar for X, Y, and W cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Binocular interactions in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus, II: Effects on dominant-eye spatial-frequency and contrast processing.Vis Neurosci. 1992 Jun;8(6):557-66. doi: 10.1017/s0952523800005654. Vis Neurosci. 1992. PMID: 1586654
-
W-and Y-cells in the C layers of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus: normal properties and effects of monocular deprivation.J Neurophysiol. 1989 Jan;61(1):58-73. doi: 10.1152/jn.1989.61.1.58. J Neurophysiol. 1989. PMID: 2918349
-
Linear and nonlinear W-cells in C-laminae of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus.J Neurophysiol. 1982 May;47(5):869-84. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.47.5.869. J Neurophysiol. 1982. PMID: 7086473
-
Laminar organization of geniculostriate projections. A common organizational plan based on layers rather than individual functional classes.Brain Behav Evol. 1988;32(3):187-92. doi: 10.1159/000116546. Brain Behav Evol. 1988. PMID: 3058267 Review.
-
Dorsal raphe nucleus projecting retinal ganglion cells: Why Y cells?Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Oct;57:118-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 5. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015. PMID: 26363667 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Binocular response modulation in the lateral geniculate nucleus.J Comp Neurol. 2019 Feb 15;527(3):522-534. doi: 10.1002/cne.24417. Epub 2018 Mar 9. J Comp Neurol. 2019. PMID: 29473163 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development, form, and function of the mouse visual thalamus.J Neurophysiol. 2018 Jul 1;120(1):211-225. doi: 10.1152/jn.00651.2017. Epub 2018 Apr 11. J Neurophysiol. 2018. PMID: 29641300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Binocular integration in the mouse lateral geniculate nuclei.Curr Biol. 2014 Jun 2;24(11):1241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 May 22. Curr Biol. 2014. PMID: 24856206 Free PMC article.
-
Transient expression of heavy-chain neurofilaments in the perigeniculate nucleus of cats.Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Mar;229(2):489-495. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02752-6. Epub 2024 Jan 24. Brain Struct Funct. 2024. PMID: 38265459
-
Widespread and Multifaceted Binocular Integration in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.J Neurosci. 2023 Sep 20;43(38):6495-6507. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0925-23.2023. Epub 2023 Aug 21. J Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37604691 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous