Prediction of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit With Minimal Electronic Health Record Data: A Machine Learning Approach
- PMID: 27694098
- PMCID: PMC5065680
- DOI: 10.2196/medinform.5909
Prediction of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit With Minimal Electronic Health Record Data: A Machine Learning Approach
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is one of the leading causes of mortality in hospitalized patients. Despite this fact, a reliable means of predicting sepsis onset remains elusive. Early and accurate sepsis onset predictions could allow more aggressive and targeted therapy while maintaining antimicrobial stewardship. Existing detection methods suffer from low performance and often require time-consuming laboratory test results.
Objective: To study and validate a sepsis prediction method, InSight, for the new Sepsis-3 definitions in retrospective data, make predictions using a minimal set of variables from within the electronic health record data, compare the performance of this approach with existing scoring systems, and investigate the effects of data sparsity on InSight performance.
Methods: We apply InSight, a machine learning classification system that uses multivariable combinations of easily obtained patient data (vitals, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, Glasgow Coma Score, and age), to predict sepsis using the retrospective Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III dataset, restricted to intensive care unit (ICU) patients aged 15 years or more. Following the Sepsis-3 definitions of the sepsis syndrome, we compare the classification performance of InSight versus quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), modified early warning score (MEWS), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) to determine whether or not patients will become septic at a fixed period of time before onset. We also test the robustness of the InSight system to random deletion of individual input observations.
Results: In a test dataset with 11.3% sepsis prevalence, InSight produced superior classification performance compared with the alternative scores as measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) and area under precision-recall curves (APR). In detection of sepsis onset, InSight attains AUROC = 0.880 (SD 0.006) at onset time and APR = 0.595 (SD 0.016), both of which are superior to the performance attained by SIRS (AUROC: 0.609; APR: 0.160), qSOFA (AUROC: 0.772; APR: 0.277), and MEWS (AUROC: 0.803; APR: 0.327) computed concurrently, as well as SAPS II (AUROC: 0.700; APR: 0.225) and SOFA (AUROC: 0.725; APR: 0.284) computed at admission (P<.001 for all comparisons). Similar results are observed for 1-4 hours preceding sepsis onset. In experiments where approximately 60% of input data are deleted at random, InSight attains an AUROC of 0.781 (SD 0.013) and APR of 0.401 (SD 0.015) at sepsis onset time. Even with 60% of data missing, InSight remains superior to the corresponding SIRS scores (AUROC and APR, P<.001), qSOFA scores (P=.0095; P<.001) and superior to SOFA and SAPS II computed at admission (AUROC and APR, P<.001), where all of these comparison scores (except InSight) are computed without data deletion.
Conclusions: Despite using little more than vitals, InSight is an effective tool for predicting sepsis onset and performs well even with randomly missing data.
Keywords: clinical decision support systems; electronic health records; machine learning; medical informatics; sepsis.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors who have affiliations listed with Dascena (Hayward, CA, USA) are employees of Dascena.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28114553
-
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 26903335 Free PMC article.
-
SAPS III is superior to SOFA for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients based on Sepsis 3.0 criteria.Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 11. Int J Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 34775116
-
Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018. PMID: 29605565
-
A Comparison of the Quick-SOFA and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria for the Diagnosis of Sepsis and Prediction of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Chest. 2018 Mar;153(3):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 28. Chest. 2018. PMID: 29289687
Cited by
-
Survival prediction of patients with sepsis from age, sex, and septic episode number alone.Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 13;10(1):17156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73558-3. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33051513 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and longitudinal analysis of implementing Artificial Intelligence to predict clinical deterioration in adult hospitals: what is known and what remains uncertain.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):509-524. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad220. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 37964688 Free PMC article.
-
Transfer learning-enabled outcome prediction for guiding CRRT treatment of the pediatric patients with sepsis.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02623-y. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 39334261 Free PMC article.
-
Convolutional Neural Network Model for Intensive Care Unit Acute Kidney Injury Prediction.Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Feb 26;6(5):1289-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.02.031. eCollection 2021 May. Kidney Int Rep. 2021. PMID: 34013107 Free PMC article.
-
Conventional and unconventional T-cell responses contribute to the prediction of clinical outcome and causative bacterial pathogen in sepsis patients.Clin Exp Immunol. 2024 May 16;216(3):293-306. doi: 10.1093/cei/uxae019. Clin Exp Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38430552 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, Angus DC, Reinhart K, International Forum of Acute Care Trialists Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):259–72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1303–10. - PubMed
-
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche J, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent J, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.2492881 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De MA, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707–10. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous