Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;21(5):1687-1696.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1962-5. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

Light-curing units used in dentistry: factors associated with heat development-potential risk for patients

Affiliations

Light-curing units used in dentistry: factors associated with heat development-potential risk for patients

Mathieu Mouhat et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate how heat development in the pulp chamber and coronal surface of natural teeth with and without cusps subjected to irradiance using light-emitting diode (LED)-light-curing units (LCUs) is associated with (i) irradiance, (ii) time, (iii) distance, and (iv) radiant exposure.

Materials and methods: Three different LED-LCUs were used. Their irradiance was measured with a calibrated spectrometer (BlueLight Analytics Inc., Halifax, Canada). An experimental rig was constructed to control the thermal environment of the teeth. The LED-LCU tip position was accurately controlled by a gantry system. Tooth surface temperature was measured by thermography (ThermaCAM S65 HS, FLIR Systems, Wilsonville, USA) and pulp chamber temperature with a thermocouple. LED-LCU tip distance and irradiation times tested were 0, 2, and 4 mm and 10, 20, and 30 s, respectively. Ethical permission was not required for the use of extracted teeth.

Results: Maximum surface and pulp chamber temperatures were recorded in tooth without cusps (58.1 °C ± 0.9 °C and 43.1 °C ± 0.9 °C, respectively). Radiant exposure explained the largest amount of variance in temperature, being more affected by time than irradiance.

Conclusions: At all combinations of variables tested, repeated measurements produced consistent results indicating the reliability of the method used. Increased exposure time seems to be the factor most likely to cause tissue damage.

Clinical relevance: Risk of superficial tissue damage at irradiances >1200 mW/cm2 is evident. There is a risk of pulp damage when only thin dentin is left at higher irradiances (>1200 mW/cm2). Clinicians should be aware of LED-LCU settings and possible high temperature generated.

Keywords: Curing lights; Dentistry; Light; Temperature; Tooth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The study was financially supported by the Norwegian Directorate of Health (14/1493).

Ethical approval

Since the experiments involved the use of human material (i.e., extracted teeth), ethical permission was asked for from the Norwegian Regional committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK). The committee concluded that such permission was not required (2015/234/REK Nord).

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent was not required

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a, b The placement of a tooth in the thin plastic sheet with the root visible on one side and the crown on the other are shown. During an experiment, the thin plastic sheet with the mounted tooth was placed on the water surface, such that the root was submerged in the water. c The position of the LED-LCU being tested. Overview of the experimental setup (d) showing the position of the infrared camera over the opening of the water bath during an experiment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Thermograms showing temperature distribution on the surface of a tooth when subjected to a 30-s irradiation with a LED light-curing unit Bluephase style®. a Thermogram of tooth with a flat dentin surface with a pulpal wall thickness of approximately 0.6 mm (T2). b Thermogram of tooth with class I cavity (T1)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bouillaguet S, Caillot G, Forchelet J, Cattani-Lorente M, Wataha JC. Thermal risks from LED- and high-intensity QTH-curing units during polymerization of dental resins. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;72(2):260–267. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aksakalli S, Demir A, Selek M, Tasdemir S. Temperature increase during orthodontic bonding with different curing units using an infrared camera. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(1):36–41. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.794954. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nomoto R, McCabe JF, Hirano S (2004) Comparison of halogen, plasma and LED curing units. Oper Dent 29(3):287–294 - PubMed
    1. “LED”, in The American Heritage Science Dictionary (2005) Houghton Mifflin Company
    1. Park SH, Roulet JF, Heintze SD. Parameters influencing increase in pulp chamber temperature with light-curing devices: curing lights and pulpal flow rates. Oper Dent. 2010;35(3):353–361. doi: 10.2341/09-234-L. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources