The effect of domiciliary noninvasive ventilation on clinical outcomes in stable and recently hospitalized patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 27698560
- PMCID: PMC5034919
- DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S104238
The effect of domiciliary noninvasive ventilation on clinical outcomes in stable and recently hospitalized patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) improves survival among patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure in hospital, but evidence for its use in domiciliary settings is limited. A patient's underlying risk of having an exacerbation may affect any potential benefit that can be gained from domiciliary NIV. This is the first comprehensive systematic review to stratify patients based on a proxy for exacerbation risk: patients in a stable state and those immediately post-exacerbation hospitalization.
Methods: A systematic review of nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken in order to compare the relative effectiveness of different types of domiciliary NIV and usual care on hospital admissions, mortality, and health-related quality of life. Standard systematic review methods were used for identifying studies (until September 2014), quality appraisal, and synthesis. Data were presented in forest plots and pooled where appropriate using random-effects meta-analysis.
Results: Thirty-one studies were included. For stable patients, there was no evidence of a survival benefit from NIV (relative risk [RR] 0.88 [0.55, 1.43], I2=60.4%, n=7 RCTs), but there was a possible trend toward fewer hospitalizations (weighted mean difference -0.46 [-1.02, 0.09], I2=59.2%, n=5 RCTs) and improved health-related quality of life. For posthospital patients, survival benefit could not be demonstrated within the three RCTs (RR 0.89 [0.53, 1.49], I2=25.1%), although there was evidence of benefit from four non-RCTs (RR 0.45 [0.32, 0.65], I2=0%). Effects on hospitalizations were inconsistent. Post hoc analyses suggested that NIV-related improvements in hypercapnia were associated with reduced hospital admissions across both populations. Little data were available comparing different types of NIV.
Conclusion: The effectiveness of domiciliary NIV remains uncertain; however, some patients may benefit. Further research is required to identify these patients and to explore the relevance of improvements in hypercapnia in influencing clinical outcomes. Optimum time points for commencing domiciliary NIV and equipment settings need to be established.
Keywords: COPD; domiciliary; hospitalization; meta-analysis; noninvasive ventilation; systematic review.
Figures






Similar articles
-
The cost-effectiveness of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation in patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(81):1-246. doi: 10.3310/hta19810. Health Technol Assess. 2015. PMID: 26470875 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 9;8(8):CD002878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002878.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34368950 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):CD004104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004104.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28702957 Free PMC article.
-
Immunostimulants versus placebo for preventing exacerbations in adults with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD013343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013343.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36373977 Free PMC article.
-
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34693988 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Patients experience regarding home mechanical ventilation in an outpatient setting.Chron Respir Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;19:14799731221137082. doi: 10.1177/14799731221137082. Chron Respir Dis. 2022. PMID: 36417310 Free PMC article.
-
Home mechanical ventilation: quality of life patterns after six months of treatment.BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Aug 17;20(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01262-z. BMC Pulm Med. 2020. PMID: 32807149 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of outpatient adaptation to home mechanical ventilation on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD: the OutVent study.ERJ Open Res. 2024 Sep 30;10(5):00125-2024. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00125-2024. eCollection 2024 Sep. ERJ Open Res. 2024. PMID: 39351377 Free PMC article.
-
Update: non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(Suppl 1):S71-S79. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.44. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 29445530 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Insights about the economic impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease readmissions post implementation of the hospital readmission reduction program.Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018 Mar;24(2):138-146. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000454. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018. PMID: 29210750 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agusti AG, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(4):347–365. - PubMed
-
- Seemungal T, Donaldson G, Paul E, Bestall J, Jeffries D, Wedzicha J. Effect of exacerbation on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(5 Pt 1):1418–1422. - PubMed
-
- Britton M. The burden of COPD in the U.K.: results from the Confronting COPD survey. Respir Med. 2003;97(Suppl C):S71–S79. - PubMed
-
- Connors AF, Jr, Dawson NV, Thomas C, et al. Outcomes following acute exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive lung disease. The SUPPORT investigators (Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments) Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154(4):959–967. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical