Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan;14(1):24-34.
doi: 10.1007/s13311-016-0479-6.

Imaging as an Outcome Measure in Multiple Sclerosis

Affiliations
Review

Imaging as an Outcome Measure in Multiple Sclerosis

Daniel Ontaneda et al. Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sensitive to lesion formation both in the brain and spinal cord. Imaging plays a prominent role in the diagnosis and monitoring of MS. Over a dozen anti-inflammatory therapies are approved for MS and the development of many of these medications was made possible through the use of contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI as a phase II outcome. A similar phase II outcome method for the neurodegeneration that underlies progressive courses of the disease is still unavailable. Although magnetic resonance is an invaluable tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment effects in MS, several imaging barriers still exist. In general, MRI is less sensitive to gray matter lesions, lacks pathological specificity, and does not provide quantitative data easily. Several advanced imaging methods including diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer, functional MRI, myelin water fraction imaging, ultra-high field MRI, positron emission tomography, and optical coherence tomography of the retina study promising ways of overcoming the difficulties in MS imaging.

Keywords: MRI; Multiple sclerosis; atrophy; biomarker; lesions; optical coherence tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Meta-analysis of 31 trials (circles) with regression (lines) plotted shows the effect of relapses based on the effects on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Log(MRIeffect) is logarithm of the MRI lesion rate ratio. Permission from Sormani et al. [2]

References

    1. Torkildsen O, Myhr KM, Bo L. Disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis—a review of approved medications. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(Suppl. 1):18–27. doi: 10.1111/ene.12883. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sormani MP, Bruzzi P. MRI lesions as a surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:669–676. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70103-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willoughby EW, Grochowski E, Li DK, Oger J, Kastrukoff LF, Paty DW. Serial magnetic resonance scanning in multiple sclerosis: a second prospective study in relapsing patients. Ann Neurol. 1989;25:43–49. doi: 10.1002/ana.410250107. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Isaac C, Li DK, Genton M, et al. Multiple sclerosis: a serial study using MRI in relapsing patients. Neurology. 1988;38:1511–1515. doi: 10.1212/WNL.38.10.1511. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Frequin ST, et al. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: sequential enhanced MR imaging vs clinical findings in determining disease activity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:1041–1047. doi: 10.2214/ajr.159.5.1414773. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms