Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;85(3):601-610.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.033. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting

Affiliations

Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting

Alexander Lee et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopist fatigue may impact colonoscopy quality, but prior studies conflict, and minimal data exist from community-based practices where most colonoscopies are performed.

Methods: Within a large, community-based integrated healthcare system, we evaluated the associations among 4 measures of endoscopist fatigue and colonoscopic adenoma detection from 2010 to 2013. Fatigue measures included afternoon versus morning colonoscopy and the number of GI procedures performed before a given colonoscopy, including consideration of prior procedure complexity. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders using multivariate logistic regression.

Results: We identified 126 gastroenterologists who performed 259,064 total GI procedures (median, 6 per day; range, 1-24), including 76,445 screening and surveillance colonoscopies. Compared with morning examinations, colonoscopies in the afternoon were not associated with lower adenoma detection for screening examinations, surveillance examinations, or their combination (OR for combination, .99; 95% CI, .96-1.03). The number of procedures performed before a given colonoscopy, with or without consideration of prior procedure complexity, was also not inversely associated with adenoma detection (OR for adenoma detection for colonoscopies in the fourth quartile of fatigue based on the number of prior procedures performed vs colonoscopies performed as the first procedure of the day, .99; 95% CI, .94-1.04).

Conclusions: In a large community-based setting, adenoma detection for screening and surveillance colonoscopies were not associated with either time of day or the number of prior procedures performed by the endoscopist, within the range of procedure volumes evaluated. The lack of association persisted after accounting for prior procedure complexity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The frequency of colonoscopic adenoma detection by endoscopist fatigue score
Raw fatigue score is the sum of the raw weights for the GI procedures performed by the physician before the given colonoscopy; consensus fatigue score is the sum of the consensus weights for the GI procedures performed by the physician before the given colonoscopy; and RVU fatigue score is the sum of the RVU weights for the GI procedures performed by the physician before the given colonoscopy.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Association between endoscopist fatigue scores (raw, consensus, and RVU fatigue scores) and colonoscopic adenoma detection (screening and surveillance colonoscopy examinations)
1st of Day is the reference and refers to the colonoscopies that were the first GI procedures of the day. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. RVU, relative value units. Raw fatigue score is the sum of the raw weights for the GI procedures performed by the physician before the given colonoscopy; consensus fatigue score is the sum of the consensus weights for the GI procedures performed by the physician before the given colonoscopy; and RVU fatigue score is the sum of the RVU weights for the GI procedures performed by the physician before the given colonoscopy.

Comment in

References

    1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–95. - PubMed
    1. Williams JE, Holub JL, Faigel DO. Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2012;75:576–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. The New England journal of medicine. 2014;370:1298–306. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2015;81:31–53. - PubMed
    1. Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RG, et al. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy. 2014;46:203–11. - PubMed