Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;20(3):270-272.
doi: 10.5213/inj.1632536.268. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With a Cardiac Pacemaker

Affiliations

Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With a Cardiac Pacemaker

Abdullah A Gahzi et al. Int Neurourol J. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe our experience using sacral neuromodulation to treat urinary urgency, frequency, urge incontinence, and chronic urinary retention in patients with cardiac pacemakers. With the increasingly widespread use of InterStim for bladder function restoration, we are seeing more complex patients with multiple comorbidities, including cardiac conditions. Herein, we report 3 cases of individuals with cardiac pacemakers who underwent InterStim implantation to treat urinary conditions. This study is a case series of 3 patients with cardiac pacemakers who underwent sacral neuromodulation to treat refractory voiding dysfunction. The initial patient screening for InterStim therapy involved percutaneous nerve evaluation (PNE), in which a temporary untined lead wire was placed through the S3 foramen. Patients who did not respond to PNE proceeded to a staged implant. All patients in this study had a greater than 50% improvement of their urinary symptoms during the initial trial and underwent placement of the InterStim implantable pulse generator (IPG). Postoperative programming was done under electrocardiogram monitoring by a cardiologist. No interference was observed between the Inter- Stim IPG and the cardiac pacemaker. In this group of patients, sacral neuromodulation in the presence of a cardiac pacemaker appears to have been safe.

Keywords: Cardiac Pacemakers; Implantable Pulse Generator; Sacral Neuromodulation; Urge Urinary Incontinence; Urinary Retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW, Abrams P, Herzog AR, Corey R, et al. Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol. 2003;20:327–36. - PubMed
    1. Wallace PA, Lane FL, Noblett KL. Sacral nerve neuromodulation in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:94. e1-3. - PubMed
    1. Siegel SW, Catanzaro F, Dijkema HE, Elhilali MM, Fowler CJ, Gajewski JB, et al. Long-term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, and retention. Urology. 2000;56(6 Suppl 1):87–91. - PubMed
    1. Iyer R, Gnanadurai TV, Forsey P. Management of cardiac pacemaker in a patient with spinal cord stimulator implant. Pain. 1998;74:333–5. - PubMed
    1. Andersen C, Oxhøj H, Arnsbo P. Management of spinal cord stimulators in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990;13:574–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources