Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis
- PMID: 27706245
- PMCID: PMC5051732
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163588
Characteristics of Retractions from Korean Medical Journals in the KoreaMed Database: A Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
Background: Flawed or misleading articles may be retracted because of either honest scientific errors or scientific misconduct. This study explored the characteristics of retractions in medical journals published in Korea through the KoreaMed database.
Methods: We retrieved retraction articles indexed in the KoreaMed database from January 1990 to January 2016. Three authors each reviewed the details of the retractions including the reason for retraction, adherence to retraction guidelines, and appropriateness of retraction. Points of disagreement were reconciled by discussion among the three.
Results: Out of 217,839 articles in KoreaMed published from 1990 to January 2016, the publication type of 111 articles was retraction (0.051%). Of the 111 articles (addressing the retraction of 114 papers), 58.8% were issued by the authors, 17.5% were jointly issued (author, editor, and publisher), 15.8% came from editors, and 4.4% were dispatched by institutions; in 5.3% of the instances, the issuer was unstated. The reasons for retraction included duplicate publication (57.0%), plagiarism (8.8%), scientific error (4.4%), author dispute (3.5%), and other (5.3%); the reasons were unstated or unclear in 20.2%. The degree of adherence to COPE's retraction guidelines varied (79.8%-100%), and some retractions were inappropriate by COPE standards. These were categorized as follows: retraction of the first published article in the case of duplicate publication (69.2%), authorship dispute (15.4%), errata (7.7%), and other (7.7%).
Conclusion: The major reason for retraction in Korean medical journals is duplicate publication. Some retractions resulted from overreaction by the editors. Therefore, editors of Korean medical journals should take careful note of the COPE retraction guidelines and should undergo training on appropriate retraction practices.
Conflict of interest statement
HM Cho is employed by a commercial company: Infolumi Co, Inforumi. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health.BMC Vet Res. 2022 Feb 18;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03167-x. BMC Vet Res. 2022. PMID: 35180878 Free PMC article.
-
Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):567-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040964. Epub 2011 Apr 12. J Med Ethics. 2011. PMID: 21486985 Clinical Trial.
-
Retracted articles in surgery journals. What are surgeons doing wrong?Surgery. 2018 Jun;163(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Mar 8. Surgery. 2018. PMID: 29525734
-
A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine.Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(1):19-23. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000491. Eur J Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 28825929
-
Analysis of retracted articles in the surgical literature.Am J Surg. 2018 Nov;216(5):851-855. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.11.033. Epub 2017 Dec 6. Am J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29229380 Review.
Cited by
-
Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils.J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Dec 26;34(2):e6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e6. eCollection 2019 Jan 14. J Korean Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 30636943 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health.BMC Vet Res. 2022 Feb 18;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03167-x. BMC Vet Res. 2022. PMID: 35180878 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey.J Korean Med Sci. 2022 May 9;37(18):e142. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e142. J Korean Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 35535370 Free PMC article.
-
Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices.J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Oct 23;38(41):e333. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e333. J Korean Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37873630 Free PMC article.
-
Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 27;16(10):e0258935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258935. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34705841 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Furman JL, Jensen K, Murray F. Governing knowledge in the scientific community: exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Res Policy. 2012;41: 276–290. 10.1016/j.respol.2011.11.001 - DOI
-
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Retraction guidelines [Internet]. COPE; 2009 [cited 2016 Mar 15]. Available: http://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.
-
- Nath SB, Marcus SC, Druss BG. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? Med J Aust. 2006;185(3): 152–154. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources