Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 28;354(6311):481-484.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6284. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

Aerobic glycolysis promotes T helper 1 cell differentiation through an epigenetic mechanism

Affiliations

Aerobic glycolysis promotes T helper 1 cell differentiation through an epigenetic mechanism

Min Peng et al. Science. .

Abstract

Aerobic glycolysis (the Warburg effect) is a metabolic hallmark of activated T cells and has been implicated in augmenting effector T cell responses, including expression of the proinflammatory cytokine interferon-γ (IFN-γ), via 3' untranslated region (3'UTR)-mediated mechanisms. Here, we show that lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) is induced in activated T cells to support aerobic glycolysis but promotes IFN-γ expression independently of its 3'UTR. Instead, LDHA maintains high concentrations of acetyl-coenzyme A to enhance histone acetylation and transcription of Ifng Ablation of LDHA in T cells protects mice from immunopathology triggered by excessive IFN-γ expression or deficiency of regulatory T cells. These findings reveal an epigenetic mechanism by which aerobic glycolysis promotes effector T cell differentiation and suggest that LDHA may be targeted therapeutically in autoinflammatory diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. LDHA dictates aerobic glycolysis in activated CD4+ T cells
(A and B) Naïve CD4+ T cells isolated from wild-type (WT) or CD4CreLdhafl/fl (KO) mice were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in the presence of IL-2 for 2 days. Cells were replenished with fresh medium, which was harvested 24 h later. Lactate production (A) and glucose consumption (B) were determined with triplicates. (CI) Naïve WT or KO CD4+ T cells were stimulated as in (A). Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) were measured with a glycolysis stress test kit (C, E and F) or a Mito stress test kit (D, GI). Baseline ECAR (E) and stressed ECAR (F) of activated CD4+ T cells were calculated according to (C). Baseline OCR (G), stressed OCR (H) and baseline OCR/ECAR (I) were calculated according to (D). Statistics (EI) were from one of two independent experiments each with 8 biological replicates (n = 8), data represent mean ± SD, two-tailed unpaired t-test, ***P ≤ 0.001.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. LDHA regulates IFN-γ expression independent of its 3′UTR
(A and B) Naïve wild-type (WT) or CD4CreLdhafl/fl (KO) CD4+ T cells were differentiated under Th1 conditions for 3 days, and restimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and ionomycin for 4 h. IFN-γ expression was determined by intracellular staining. Representative plots (A) and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) (B) are shown. (C – E) Naïve WT or KO CD4+ T cells were activated for 2 days and transduced with green fluorescent protein (GFP) constructs fused with the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of the Ifng or Gapdh gene. GFP expression was measured 48 h after transduction. Representative plots (C) and MFI of GFP in GFP+ cells are shown (D). (E) MFI of GFP from IFN-γ 3′UTR was normalized to that of GAPDH 3′UTR control. (F) A diagram of IFN-γ mRNA expressed from the WT Ifng or Yeti allele. (G and H) Naïve CD4+ T cells from Yeti/Yeti or KOYeti/Yeti mice were differentiated as in (A). The expression of IFN-γ and eYFP were determined by flow cytometry. Representative plots and respective statistic analysis are shown in (G) and (H). Statistics (B, E and H) were from one of two independent experiments each with 3 biological replicates (n = 3), data represent mean ± SD, two-tailed unpaired t-test, *P ≤ 0.05; ***P ≤ 0.001; ns, not significant.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. LDHA promotes IFN-γ expression through an epigenetic mechanism
(A) Representative H3K9 acetylation (H3K9Ac) peaks at the Cd3e or Ifng promoter and enhancer (CNS22) regions from one of two ChIP-Seq experiments are shown. (B) H3K9Ac at the Ifng promoter and CNS22 enhancer regions in WT or KO Th1 cells were assessed by ChIP-qPCR. Enrichment was normalized to H3K9Ac at the Cd3e promoter region. (C) Naïve WT or KO CD4+ T cells were differentiated under Th1 conditions, and acetyl-CoA levels were measured by an acetyl-CoA assay kit. (D and E) Naïve WT or KO CD4+ T cells were differentiated under Th1 conditions for 3 days, and either left untreated or supplemented with 20 mM sodium acetate for another 24 h. Cells were subsequently restimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and ionomycin for 4 h. The expression of IFN-γ protein (D) and mRNA (E) were determined by flow cytometry and qPCR, respectively. mRNA level of IFN-γ was normalized to that of β-Actin. MFIs of IFN-γ are shown in (D). (F) T cells were cultured as in (D), and H3K9Ac at the Ifng promoter and CNS22 enhancer regions were assessed by ChIP-qPCR. Enrichment was normalized to H3K9Ac at the Cd3e promoter region. Statistics (B, C, E and F) were from one of three independent experiments each with 3 biological replicates (n = 3), data represent mean ± SD, two-tailed unpaired t-test, *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; ns, not significant.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. LDHA deficiency in T cells protects Yeti/Yeti mice from a lethal autoinflammatory disease
(A) The survival curve of Yeti/Yeti (n = 5) and CD4CreLdhafl/flYeti/Yeti (KO Yeti/Yeti) mice (n = 6). (B) Representative haematoxylin and eosin staining of liver sections from wild-type (WT), CD4CreLdhafl/fl (KO), Yeti/Yeti and KO Yeti/Yeti mice. Arrows indicate the necrotic regions. (C and D) Splenocytes from mice of the indicated genotypes were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and ionomycin for 4 h. IFN-γ and YFP expression in CD4+ T cells and NK1.1+TCR NK cells were determined by flow cytometry. Representative plots (C) and statistics (D) are shown, data represent mean ± SD, n = 4 – 5 mice per genotype, two-tailed paired t-test, ***P ≤ 0.001; ns, not significant.

Comment in

References

    1. Wang R, Green DR. Metabolic checkpoints in activated T cells. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:907–915. - PubMed
    1. Pearce EL, Poffenberger MC, Chang CH, Jones RG. Fueling immunity: insights into metabolism and lymphocyte function. Science. 2013;342:1242454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacIver NJ, Michalek RD, Rathmell JC. Metabolic regulation of T lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31:259–283. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ganeshan K, Chawla A. Metabolic regulation of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:609–634. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frauwirth KA, Riley JL, Harris MH, Parry RV, Rathmell JC, Plas DR, Elstrom RL, June CH, Thompson CB. The CD28 signaling pathway regulates glucose metabolism. Immunity. 2002;16:769–777. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms