Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 29:11:27.
doi: 10.1186/s13015-016-0089-1. eCollection 2016.

An efficient algorithm for protein structure comparison using elastic shape analysis

Affiliations

An efficient algorithm for protein structure comparison using elastic shape analysis

S Srivastava et al. Algorithms Mol Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Protein structure comparison play important role in in silico functional prediction of a new protein. It is also used for understanding the evolutionary relationships among proteins. A variety of methods have been proposed in literature for comparing protein structures but they have their own limitations in terms of accuracy and complexity with respect to computational time and space. There is a need to improve the computational complexity in comparison/alignment of proteins through incorporation of important biological and structural properties in the existing techniques.

Results: An efficient algorithm has been developed for comparing protein structures using elastic shape analysis in which the sequence of 3D coordinates atoms of protein structures supplemented by additional auxiliary information from side-chain properties are incorporated. The protein structure is represented by a special function called square-root velocity function. Furthermore, singular value decomposition and dynamic programming have been employed for optimal rotation and optimal matching of the proteins, respectively. Also, geodesic distance has been calculated and used as the dissimilarity score between two protein structures. The performance of the developed algorithm is tested and found to be more efficient, i.e., running time reduced by 80-90 % without compromising accuracy of comparison when compared with the existing methods. Source codes for different functions have been developed in R. Also, user friendly web-based application called ProtSComp has been developed using above algorithm for comparing protein 3D structures and is accessible free.

Conclusions: The methodology and algorithm developed in this study is taking considerably less computational time without loss of accuracy (Table 2). The proposed algorithm is considering different criteria of representing protein structures using 3D coordinates of atoms and inclusion of residue wise molecular properties as auxiliary information.

Keywords: Backbone atoms; Geodesic distance; Protein structure comparison; Side chain properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the algorithm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Home page of ProtSComp after user has logged in
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Upload file on ProtSComp server
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Provision for various parameter selections and options such model, chain and auxiliary information
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Presentation of final result as geodesic-distance in text (left) and graphical (right) form

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kolodny R, Koehl P, Levitt M. Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. J Mol Biol. 2005;346(4):1173–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.12.032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson JD, Plewniak F, Poch O. BAliBASE: a benchmark alignment database for the evaluation of multiple alignment programs. Bioinformatics. 1999;15:87–88. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.1.87. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sauder JM, Arthur JW, Dunbrack RL. Large scale comparison of protein sequence alignment algorithms with structure alignments. Proteins Struct Func Genet. 2000;40:6–22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000701)40:1<6::AID-PROT30>3.0.CO;2-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Novotny M, Madsen D, Kleywegt GJ. Evaluation of protein-fold-comparison servers. Proteins Struct Funct Genet. 2004;54:260–270. doi: 10.1002/prot.10553. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holm L, Ouzounis C, Sander C, Tuparev G, Vriend G. A database of protein structure families with common folding motifs. Protein Sci. 1992;1(12):1691–1698. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560011217. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources