Alternate-day versus daily energy restriction diets: which is more effective for weight loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 27708846
- PMCID: PMC5043510
- DOI: 10.1002/osp4.52
Alternate-day versus daily energy restriction diets: which is more effective for weight loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Alternate-day-fasting (ADF) has been proposed as an effective dieting method. Studies have found that it also can increase life span in rodents, and reduce inflammation in humans. The aim of this paper was to systematically review the efficacy of ADF compared to very-low-calorie dieting (VLCD) in terms of weight loss, and reduction of fat mass and fat-free mass.
Methods: Systematic review: PubMed literature searches were performed. Fixed review procedures were applied. Studies were evaluated for quality. Twenty-eight studies were included. Meta-analysis: 10/28 studies (four ADF and six matched VLCD) were further analyzed.
Results: After adjustment for BMI and duration, there was no significant difference in mean body weight loss (VLCD 0.88 kg more weight loss than ADF, 95% CI: -4.32, 2.56) or fat-free mass (VLCD 1.69 kg more fat-free mass loss than ADF, 95% CI: -3.62, 0.23); there was a significant difference observed in fat mass (ADF 3.31 kg more fat mass loss than VLCD, 95% CI: 0.05, 6.56). Meta-analysis showed that, among ADF studies, the pooled change in body weight, fat mass and fat-free mass was 4.30 kg (95% CI: 3.41, 5.20), 4.06 kg (95% CI: 2.99, 5.13) and 0.72 kg (95% CI: -0.07, 1.51), respectively, while among VLCD studies, the pooled change was 6.28 kg (95% CI: 6.08, 6.49), 4.22 kg (95% CI: 3.95, 4.50) and 2.24 kg (95% CI: 1.95, 2.52), respectively.
Conclusions: Our results from both the systematic review and the meta-analysis suggest that ADF is an efficacious dietary method, and may be superior to VLCD for some patients because of ease of compliance, greater fat-mass loss and relative preservation of fat-free mass. Head-to-head randomized clinical trials are needed to further assess relative efficacy of these two approaches.
Keywords: Alternate‐day fasting; fat mass; obesity; very‐low‐calorie diet.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization . Obesity and Overweight. URL http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/. Updated January 2015. (accessed May 20 2015).
-
- Tsai AG, Wadden TA. The Evolution of Very‐Low‐Calorie Diets: An Update and Meta‐analysis. Obesity 2006; 14: 1283–93. - PubMed
-
- Oberhauser F, Schulte DM, Faust M, et al. Weight loss due to a very low calorie diet differentially affects insulin sensitivity and interleukin‐6 serum levels in nondiabetic obese human subjects. Horm Metab Res 2012; 44: 465–470. - PubMed
-
- Telch CF, Agras WS. The effects of a very low calorie diet on binge eating. Behav Ther 1993; 24: 177–93.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials