Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep;2(3):293-302.
doi: 10.1002/osp4.52. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

Alternate-day versus daily energy restriction diets: which is more effective for weight loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Alternate-day versus daily energy restriction diets: which is more effective for weight loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis

B A Alhamdan et al. Obes Sci Pract. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Alternate-day-fasting (ADF) has been proposed as an effective dieting method. Studies have found that it also can increase life span in rodents, and reduce inflammation in humans. The aim of this paper was to systematically review the efficacy of ADF compared to very-low-calorie dieting (VLCD) in terms of weight loss, and reduction of fat mass and fat-free mass.

Methods: Systematic review: PubMed literature searches were performed. Fixed review procedures were applied. Studies were evaluated for quality. Twenty-eight studies were included. Meta-analysis: 10/28 studies (four ADF and six matched VLCD) were further analyzed.

Results: After adjustment for BMI and duration, there was no significant difference in mean body weight loss (VLCD 0.88 kg more weight loss than ADF, 95% CI: -4.32, 2.56) or fat-free mass (VLCD 1.69 kg more fat-free mass loss than ADF, 95% CI: -3.62, 0.23); there was a significant difference observed in fat mass (ADF 3.31 kg more fat mass loss than VLCD, 95% CI: 0.05, 6.56). Meta-analysis showed that, among ADF studies, the pooled change in body weight, fat mass and fat-free mass was 4.30 kg (95% CI: 3.41, 5.20), 4.06 kg (95% CI: 2.99, 5.13) and 0.72 kg (95% CI: -0.07, 1.51), respectively, while among VLCD studies, the pooled change was 6.28 kg (95% CI: 6.08, 6.49), 4.22 kg (95% CI: 3.95, 4.50) and 2.24 kg (95% CI: 1.95, 2.52), respectively.

Conclusions: Our results from both the systematic review and the meta-analysis suggest that ADF is an efficacious dietary method, and may be superior to VLCD for some patients because of ease of compliance, greater fat-mass loss and relative preservation of fat-free mass. Head-to-head randomized clinical trials are needed to further assess relative efficacy of these two approaches.

Keywords: Alternate‐day fasting; fat mass; obesity; very‐low‐calorie diet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the systematic review process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ADF versus VLCD: body weight difference pooled results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ADF versus VLCD: fat mass difference pooled results.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ADF versus VLCD: fat‐free mass difference pooled results.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Obesity and Overweight. URL http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/. Updated January 2015. (accessed May 20 2015).
    1. Del Corral P, Chandler‐Laney PC, Casazza K, Gower BA, Hunter GR. Effect of dietary adherence with or without exercise on weight loss: a mechanistic approach to a global problem. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 1602–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsai AG, Wadden TA. The Evolution of Very‐Low‐Calorie Diets: An Update and Meta‐analysis. Obesity 2006; 14: 1283–93. - PubMed
    1. Oberhauser F, Schulte DM, Faust M, et al. Weight loss due to a very low calorie diet differentially affects insulin sensitivity and interleukin‐6 serum levels in nondiabetic obese human subjects. Horm Metab Res 2012; 44: 465–470. - PubMed
    1. Telch CF, Agras WS. The effects of a very low calorie diet on binge eating. Behav Ther 1993; 24: 177–93.

LinkOut - more resources