Women's Contraceptive Preference-Use Mismatch
- PMID: 27710196
- PMCID: PMC5512313
- DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5807
Women's Contraceptive Preference-Use Mismatch
Abstract
Background: Family planning research has not adequately addressed women's preferences for different contraceptive methods and whether women's contraceptive experiences match their preferences.
Methods: Data were drawn from the Women's Healthcare Experiences and Preferences Study, an Internet survey of 1,078 women aged 18-55 randomly sampled from a national probability panel. Survey items assessed women's preferences for contraceptive methods, match between methods preferred and used, and perceived reasons for mismatch. We estimated predictors of contraceptive preference with multinomial logistic regression models.
Results: Among women at risk for pregnancy who responded with their preferred method (n = 363), hormonal methods (non-LARC [long-acting reversible contraception]) were the most preferred method (34%), followed by no method (23%) and LARC (18%). Sociodemographic differences in contraception method preferences were noted (p-values <0.05), generally with minority, married, and older women having higher rates of preferring less effective methods, compared to their counterparts. Thirty-six percent of women reported preference-use mismatch, with the majority preferring more effective methods than those they were using. Rates of match between preferred and usual methods were highest for LARC (76%), hormonal (non-LARC) (65%), and no method (65%). The most common reasons for mismatch were cost/insurance (41%), lack of perceived/actual need (34%), and method-specific preference concerns (19%).
Conclusion: While preference for effective contraception was common among this sample of women, we found substantial mismatch between preferred and usual methods, notably among women of lower socioeconomic status and women using less effective methods. Findings may have implications for patient-centered contraceptive interventions.
Keywords: contraception; health service delivery; patient preference; patient-centered; reproductive health; women's health.
Conflict of interest statement
V.K.D. has received payments from the University of California, San Francisco, to provide content expertise during the development of a web-based educational program on early pregnancy failure funded by an anonymous donor (2012); has received payments for expert witness work for Bayer (2014, 2015); has received a one-time honorarium for participation in an expert advisory panel for Johnson and Johnson. (Dec. 2012); and is an UNPAID Merck Nexplanon trainer. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Guttmacher Institute. Contraceptive Use in the United States. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute, 2014
-
- Guttmacher Institute. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute, 2015
-
- Tonkelaar D den, Oddens BJ. Factors influencing women's satisfaction with birth control methods. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2001;6:153–158 - PubMed
-
- Urdl W, Apter D, Alperstein A, et al. . Contraceptive efficacy, compliance and beyond: Factors related to satisfaction with once-weekly transdermal compared with oral contraception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;121:202–210 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical