Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 6;11(10):e0164130.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164130. eCollection 2016.

The Association between Educational Level and Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases within the EPICOR Study: New Evidence for an Old Inequality Problem

Affiliations

The Association between Educational Level and Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases within the EPICOR Study: New Evidence for an Old Inequality Problem

Fulvio Ricceri et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: A consistent association has been reported between low socioeconomic status (SES) and cardiovascular events (CE), whereas the association between SES and cerebrovascular events (CBVD) is less clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between SES (measured using education) and CE/CBVD in a cohort study, as well as to investigate lifestyle and clinical risk factors, to help to clarify the mechanisms by which SES influences CE/CBVD.

Material and methods: We searched for diagnoses of CE and CBVD in the clinical records of 47,749 members of the EPICOR cohort (average follow-up time: 11 years). SES was determined by the relative index of inequality (RII).

Results: A total of 1,156 CE and 468 CBVD were found in the clinical records. An increased risk of CE was observed in the crude Cox model for the third tertile of RII compared to the first tertile (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.61). The increased risk persisted after adjustment for lifestyle risk factors (HR = 1.19; 95%CI 1.02-1.38), clinical risk factors (HR = 1.35; 95%CI 1.17-1.56), and after full adjustment (HR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.01-1.37). Structural equation model showed that lifestyle rather than clinical risk factors are involved in the mechanisms by which education influences CE. No significant association was found between education and CBVD. A strong relationship was observed between education and diabetes at baseline.

Conclusion: The most important burden of inequality in CE incidence in Italy is due to lifestyle risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Direct Acyclic Graph (DAG) for the association of low educational status and Major Cardiovascular Events with results from Structural Equation Model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brawley OW, Berger MZ. Cancer and disparities in health: perspectives on health statistics and research questions. Cancer. 2008. October 1;113(7 Suppl):1744–54. 10.1002/cncr.23800 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frampton GK, Shepherd J, Dorne JL. Demographic data in asthma clinical trials: a systematic review with implications for generalizing trial findings and tackling health disparities. Soc Sci Med. 2009. October;69(8):1147–54. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sacerdote C, Ricceri F, Rolandsson O, Baldi I, Chirlaque MD, Feskens E, et al. Lower educational level is a predictor of incident type 2 diabetes in European countries: the EPIC-InterAct study. Int J Epidemiol. 2012. August;41(4):1162–73. 10.1093/ije/dys091 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rawshani A, Svensson AM, Zethelius B, Eliasson B, Rosengren A, Gudbjörnsdottir S. Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Mortality, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. August 1;176(8):1146–54 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2940 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clark AM, DesMeules M, Luo W, Duncan AS, Wielgosz A. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009. November;6(11):712–22. 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.163 - DOI - PubMed