Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;33(1):145-151.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3261-5. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

An interictal EEG can predict the outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy for children with intractable epilepsy

Affiliations

An interictal EEG can predict the outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy for children with intractable epilepsy

Min-Jee Kim et al. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in children and adolescents with intractable epilepsy and identify predictive factors for responsiveness to VNS.

Methods: Medical records of pediatric patients who underwent VNS implantation at two Korean tertiary centers were reviewed. At 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 years post-VNS implantation, the frequency of the most disabling seizures in each patient was assessed. Responders were defined as showing an overall 50 % reduction from baseline seizure frequency during follow-up. The clinical characteristics of responders and non-responders were compared.

Results: Among 58 patients, approximately half (29/58) were responders. The mean age at implantation was 10.9 years (range, 2.7-20.9) and the mean follow-up duration after VNS implantation was 8.4 years (range, 1-15.5). At 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 years after implantation, 43.1, 50.0, 56.9, and 58.1 % of patients exhibited ≥50 % seizure frequency reduction disabling seizures. The patients with focal or multifocal epileptiform discharges were more likely to be responders than those with generalized epileptiform activities by video or conventional EEG at the time of VNS implantation (Pearson's and χ 2 test, p = 0.001). No other clinical variables were found to be associated with seizure outcomes. Wound infections caused VNS removal in two cases. All other adverse events, including cough and hoarseness, were tolerable.

Conclusion: VNS is a well-tolerated and effective adjuvant therapy in pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy. Notably, patients with focal epileptiform discharges alone rather than those with generalized epileptiform discharges maybe better candidates for VNS.

Keywords: Child; EEG; Epilepsy; Pediatric; Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seizure. 2009 Jan;18(1):34-7 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;76(3):384-9 - PubMed
    1. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010 Jun;26(6):811-9 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 May;7(5):491-500 - PubMed
    1. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;99:93-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources