Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;22(11):259.
doi: 10.1007/s00894-016-3119-5. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

A method for predicting individual residue contributions to enzyme specificity and binding-site energies, and its application to MTH1

Affiliations

A method for predicting individual residue contributions to enzyme specificity and binding-site energies, and its application to MTH1

James J P Stewart. J Mol Model. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

A new method for predicting the energy contributions to substrate binding and to specificity has been developed. Conventional global optimization methods do not permit the subtle effects responsible for these properties to be modeled with sufficient precision to allow confidence to be placed in the results, but by making simple alterations to the model, the precisions of the various energies involved can be improved from about ±2 kcal mol-1 to ±0.1 kcal mol-1. This technique was applied to the oxidized nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase enzyme MTH1. MTH1 is unusual in that the binding and reaction sites are well separated-an advantage from a computational chemistry perspective, as it allows the energetics involved in docking to be modeled without the need to consider any issues relating to reaction mechanisms. In this study, two types of energy terms were investigated: the noncovalent interactions between the binding site and the substrate, and those responsible for discriminating between the oxidized nucleotide 8-oxo-dGTP and the normal dGTP. Both of these were investigated using the semiempirical method PM7 in the program MOPAC. The contributions of the individual residues to both the binding energy and the specificity of MTH1 were calculated by simulating the effect of mutations. Where comparisons were possible, all calculated results were in agreement with experimental observations. This technique provides fresh insight into the binding mechanism that enzymes use for discriminating between possible substrates.

Keywords: Binding; Docking; Enzyme specificity; MTH1; Noncovalent interactions; Nucleotide hydrolysis; PM7.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards Disclaimer This work is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
MTH1 plus 8-oxo-dGMP substrate, showing the substrate in the binding site between two α-helices and in front of a β-sheet. In the binding site, the substrate forms five hydrogen bonds with the enzyme: one from Asp119, two from Asp120, and two from Asn33. Two water molecules, 2024 and 2134, also form hydrogen bonds with the substrate
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Atom numbering system for 8-oxo-guanine
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The D119–D120 anion in MTH1. The position of the ionizable hydrogen atom suggests that Asp119 exists as the carboxylate anion and that Asp120 exists as the neutral carboxylic acid
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Stereo view of residues in the binding pocket that do not form hydrogen bonds with the 8-oxo-dGMP substrate
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Hydrogen-bonding structure in the D119–D120–guanine complex
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mutation D119A in MTH1 + 8-oxo-dGMP. In the D119A mutation, Asp120 spontaneously ionizes to form the carboxylate, which hydrogen bonds to neutral guanine
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Mutation D120A in MTH1 + 8-oxo-dGMP. In the D120A mutation, the position of the ionizable hydrogen atom suggests that Asp119 remains a neutral carboxylic acid which forms a strong hydrogen bond with the guanine anion
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Comparison of the Asp119–Asp120–guanine X-ray and PM7 environments. Left panel: structure from chain B in 3ZR0. Right panel: structure predicted using PM7

References

    1. Carvalho ATP, Barrozo A, Doron D, Kilshtain AV, Major DT, Kamerlin SCL. Challenges in computational studies of enzyme structure, function and dynamics. J Mol Graph Model. 2014;54:62–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2014.09.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yilmazer ND, Korth M (2016) Recent progress in treating protein–ligand interactions with quantum-mechanical Methods. Int J Mol Sci 17(5):742 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stewart JJP (2013) Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods VI: more modifications to the NDDO approximations and re-optimization of parameters. J Mol Modeling 19:1–32 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin BP, Brandon CJ, Stewart JJ, Braun‐Sand SB (2015) Accuracy issues involved in modeling in vivo protein structures using PM7. Proteins 83(8):1427–1435 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brandon CJ, Martin BP, McGee KJ, Stewart JJP, Braun-Sand SB (2015) An approach to creating a more realistic working model from a Protein Data Bank entry. J Mol Modeling 21:3 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources