Barriers to Electronic Health Record Adoption: a Systematic Literature Review
- PMID: 27714560
- PMCID: PMC5054043
- DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0628-9
Barriers to Electronic Health Record Adoption: a Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Federal efforts and local initiatives to increase adoption and use of electronic health records (EHRs) continue, particularly since the enactment of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. Roughly one in four hospitals not adopted even a basic EHR system. A review of the barriers may help in understanding the factors deterring certain healthcare organizations from implementation. We wanted to assemble an updated and comprehensive list of adoption barriers of EHR systems in the United States. Authors searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar, and accepted only articles relevant to our primary objective. Reviewers independently assessed the works highlighted by our search and selected several for review. Through multiple consensus meetings, authors tapered articles to a final selection most germane to the topic (n = 27). Each article was thoroughly examined by multiple authors in order to achieve greater validity. Authors identified 39 barriers to EHR adoption within the literature selected for the review. These barriers appeared 125 times in the literature; the most frequently mentioned barriers were regarding cost, technical concerns, technical support, and resistance to change. Despite federal and local incentives, the initial cost of adopting an EHR is a common existing barrier. The other most commonly mentioned barriers include technical support, technical concerns, and maintenance/ongoing costs. Policy makers should consider incentives that continue to reduce implementation cost, possibly aimed more directly at organizations that are known to have lower adoption rates, such as small hospitals in rural areas.
Keywords: Adoption: implementation; Barriers; Challenges; Electronic health records.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with Ethical Standards Funding There was no funding associated with this research. Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest Clemens Scott Kruse declares that he has no conflicts of interest. Beau Jones declares that he has no conflicts of interest. Erica Mitchell declares that she has no conflicts of interest. Caitlin Kristof declares that she has no conflicts of interest. Angelica Martinez declares that she has no conflicts of interest. Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. Informed Consent Not applicable.
Figures
References
-
- Charles D, Gabriel M, Searcy T. Adoption of electronic health record systems among US non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008–2012. ONC. Data. Brief. 2013;9:1–9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
