Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 5;16(1):295.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1071-0.

Seeking order amidst chaos: a systematic review of classification systems for causes of stillbirth and neonatal death, 2009-2014

Susannah Hopkins Leisher  1   2 , Zheyi Teoh  3 , Hanna Reinebrant  3   4 , Emma Allanson  5   6 , Hannah Blencowe  7 , Jan Jaap Erwich  4   8 , J Frederik Frøen  9   10 , Jason Gardosi  11 , Sanne Gordijn  4   8 , A Metin Gülmezoglu  5 , Alexander E P Heazell  4   12   13 , Fleurisca Korteweg  4   14 , Joy Lawn  7 , Elizabeth M McClure  4   15 , Robert Pattinson  16 , Gordon C S Smith  17 , Ӧzge Tunçalp  5 , Aleena M Wojcieszek  3   4 , Vicki Flenady  3   4
Affiliations

Seeking order amidst chaos: a systematic review of classification systems for causes of stillbirth and neonatal death, 2009-2014

Susannah Hopkins Leisher et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Each year, about 5.3 million babies die in the perinatal period. Understanding of causes of death is critical for prevention, yet there is no globally acceptable classification system. Instead, many disparate systems have been developed and used. We aimed to identify all systems used or created between 2009 and 2014, with their key features, including extent of alignment with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and variation in features by region, to inform the World Health Organization's development of a new global approach to classifying perinatal deaths.

Methods: A systematic literature review (CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, Global Health, and PubMed) identified published and unpublished studies and national reports describing new classification systems or modifications of existing systems for causes of perinatal death, or that used or tested such systems, between 2009 and 2014. Studies reporting ICD use only were excluded. Data were independently double-extracted (except from non-English publications). Subgroup analyses explored variation by extent and region.

Results: Eighty-one systems were identified as new, modifications of existing systems, or having been used between 2009 and 2014, with an average of ten systems created/modified each year. Systems had widely varying characteristics: (i) comprehensiveness (40 systems classified both stillbirths and neonatal deaths); (ii) extent of use (systems were created in 28 countries and used in 40; 17 were created for national use; 27 were widely used); (iii) accessibility (three systems available in e-format); (iv) underlying cause of death (64 systems required a single cause of death); (v) reliability (10 systems tested for reliability, with overall Kappa scores ranging from .35-.93); and (vi) ICD alignment (17 systems used ICD codes). Regional databases were not searched, so system numbers may be underestimated. Some non-differential misclassification of systems was possible.

Conclusions: The plethora of systems in use, and continuing system development, hamper international efforts to improve understanding of causes of death. Recognition of the features of currently used systems, combined with a better understanding of the drivers of continued system creation, may help the development of a truly effective global system.

Keywords: Cause of death; Classification; Classification system; Neonatal death; Perinatal death; Stillbirth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Definitions of terms used
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Search string
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Classification systems for causes of stillbirths and neonatal deaths, 2009–2014: PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Classification systems for causes of stillbirths and neonatal deaths, 2009–2014: Countries of origin and use
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. You D, Hug L, Ejdemyr S, Beise J, on behalf of the United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). Levels and Trends in Child Mortality Report 2015. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2015.
    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):587–603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heazell AE, Siassakos D, Blencowe H, Burden C, Bhutta ZA, Cacciatore J, et al. Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):604–16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan A, King JF, Flenady V, Haslam RH, Tudehope DI. Classification of perinatal deaths: development of the Australian and New Zealand classifications. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004;40(7):340–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2004.00398.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Galan-Roosen AE, Kuijpers JC, van der Straaten PJ, Merkus JM. Fundamental classification of perinatal death. Validation of a new classification system of perinatal death. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;103(1):30–6. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00023-4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types