Ethical considerations in the translation of regenerative biofabrication technologies into clinic and society
- PMID: 27716629
- PMCID: PMC7116024
- DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/042001
Ethical considerations in the translation of regenerative biofabrication technologies into clinic and society
Abstract
Biofabrication technologies have the potential to improve healthcare by providing highly advanced and personalized biomedical products for research, treatment and prevention. As the combining of emerging techniques and integrating various biological and synthetic components becomes increasingly complex, it is important that relevant stakeholders anticipate the translation of biofabricated 3D tissue products into patients and society. Ethics is sometimes regarded as a brake on scientific progress, yet from our perspective, ethics in parallel with research anticipates societal impacts of emerging technologies and stimulates responsible innovation. For the ethical assessment, the biofabrication field benefits from similarities to regenerative medicine and an increasing ethical awareness in the development of tissue-engineered products. However, the novelty of the technology itself, the increase in attainable structural complexity, and the potential for automation and personalization are distinguishing facets of biofabrication that call for a specific exploration of the ethics of biofabrication. This review aims to highlight important points of existing ethical discussions, as well as to call attention to emerging issues specific to 3D biofabrication in bench and bedside research and the translation to society.
References
-
- Daar AS, Greenwood HL. A proposed definition of regenerative medicine. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2007;1:179–84. - PubMed
-
- Nerem RM, Sambanis A. Tissue engineering: from biology to biological substitutes. Tissue Engineering. 1995;1:3–13. - PubMed
-
- Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, Burdick JA, Cho DW, Dalton PD, Derby B, Forgacs G, Li Q, Mironov VA, Moroni L, et al. Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication. 2016;8 013001. - PubMed
-
- Ozbolat IT. Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ constructs for transplantation. Trends in Biotechnology. 2015;33:395–400. - PubMed
-
- Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–85. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous