Risk of selection bias in randomized trials: further insight
- PMID: 27717392
- PMCID: PMC5055691
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1597-5
Risk of selection bias in randomized trials: further insight
Abstract
The quality of randomization is an under-appreciated facet of trial design. The present piece represents an advance in our collective understanding of how allocation concealment and randomization relate to risk of selection bias in randomized trials, and other measures are also considered. Though the overwhelming majority of the advice given is timely and correct, it is more instructive to focus on the relatively narrow sliver of advice that is incorrect (namely, that trials should not stratify by site, and that unrestricted randomization is a solution to the problem of selection bias), so it is in this context that the comments here must be understood. In no way is this intended to be a rebuttal of the excellent work we have before us. Rather, it is a refinement.
Keywords: Allocation concealment; Berger-Exner test; Conditional unrestricted randomization; Maximal procedure.
Comment on
-
Risk of selection bias in randomised trials.Trials. 2015 Sep 10;16:405. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0920-x. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26357929 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
