Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:28:173-175.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

Suspected total spinal in patient having emergent Caesarean section, a case report and literature review

H Virgin  1 , E Oddby  2 , J G Jakobsson  3
Affiliations

Suspected total spinal in patient having emergent Caesarean section, a case report and literature review

H Virgin et al. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016.

Abstract

Introduction: Epidural analgesia is commonly used for management of pain during childbirth. Need for emergent Caesarean section e.g. because of signs of foetal distress or lack of progress is however not an uncommon event. In females having an established epidural; general anaesthesia, top-up of the epidural or putting a spinal are all possible options. Dosing of the spinal anaesthesia in females having epidural is a matter of discussion.

Presentation of case: We describe a healthy 32 years, 0 para mother in gestation week 36 having labour epidural analgesia but due to foetal distress scheduled for an emergent Caesarean section category 2 that developed upper extremity weakness and respiratory depression after administration of standard dose high density bupivacaine/morphine/fentanyl intrathecal anaesthesia. She was emergent intubated and resumed motor function after 15-20min.

Discussion: A too extensive cephalic spread was the most plausible explanation to the event. Whether or not reducing the dose for a spinal anaesthesia in mothers having an established labour epidural analgesia is a matter of discussion. It is of course of importance to achieve a rapid and effective surgical anaesthesia but also avoiding overdosing with the risk for a too high cephalic spread.

Concluiosn: To perform spinal anaesthesia for emergent Caesarean in patients having an epidural for labour pain is a feasible option and should be considered in category 2-3 section. The dose for a convert spinal block should be assessed on an individual basis and reasonably reduced.

Keywords: Caesarean section; Epidural analgesia; Spinal anaesthesia; Total spinal.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lucas D.N., Yentis S.M., Kinsella S.M. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J. R. Soc. Med. 2000;93:346–350. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tyner J.E., Rayburn W.F. Emergency cesarean delivery: special precautions. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 2013;40(1):37–45. - PubMed
    1. Regan K.J., O'Sullivan G. The extension of epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section: a survey of current UK practice. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(February (2)):136–142. - PubMed
    1. Rawal N., Schollin J., Wesström G. Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1988;32(1):61–66. - PubMed
    1. Ithnin F., Lim Y., Sia A.T., Ocampo C.E. Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients. Anesth. Analg. 2006;102(February (2)):577–580. - PubMed