Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;143(3):617-621.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

Distance from a Comprehensive Cancer Center: A proxy for poor cervical cancer outcomes?

Affiliations

Distance from a Comprehensive Cancer Center: A proxy for poor cervical cancer outcomes?

David A Barrington et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the potential relationship between outcomes in cervical cancer patients based on distance from our Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of cervical cancer patients was performed. Abstracted data included: demographics, clinicopathologic variables, treatment, and survival. Analyses both by quartiles and distance <100 and ≥100miles from our institution were performed. Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.2.

Results: 390 patients living a median distance of 58.1miles (range 1.2-571miles) from our CCC were identified. Patients were generally white (n=249), non-smokers (n=226), with Stage IB disease (n=222), squamous histology (n=295) and underwent primary surgical therapy (n=229). Patients were divided into both quartiles as well as two strata: <100 and ≥100miles for comparison. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) favored patients living closer to our center with a lower median OS for patients living ≥100miles (65.4vs. 99.4months; p=0.040). Cox proportional hazard modeling noted that advanced stage was predictive of inferior PFS and OS, while other clinical covariates including age, BMI, race, smoking status and histology had a variable impact on outcomes and distance >100miles was associated with a higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]=1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.54).

Conclusion: Overall survival for patients living >100miles from our CCC was worse when compared to patients in closer proximity. Outreach efforts and utilization of navigators may help decrease the impact of geographic and racial disparities on outcomes.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Disparities; Distance; Survival outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors affirm that they have no conflicts of interest for the current manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographic distribution heat map of patient residences
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression-free survival based on distance from NCCN cancer center
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall survival based on distance from NCCN cancer center

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30. - PubMed
    1. Harlan LC, Greene AL, Clegg LX, Mooney M, Stevens JL, Brown ML. Insurance status and the use of guideline therapy in the treatment of selected cancers. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23(36):9079–88. - PubMed
    1. Bristow RE, Powell MA, Al-Hammadi N, Chen L, Miller JP, Roland PY, et al. Disparities in ovarian cancer care quality and survival according to race and socioeconomic status. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2013;105(11):823–32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins Y, Holcomb K, Chapman-Davis E, Khabele D, Farley JH. Gynecologic cancer disparities: a report from the Health Disparities Taskforce of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Gynecologic oncology. 2014;133(2):353–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bristow RE, Ueda S, Gerardi MA, Ajiboye OB, Ibeanu OA. Analysis of racial disparities in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer care and outcomes in a tertiary gynecologic oncology referral center. Gynecologic oncology. 2011;122(2):319–23. - PubMed

MeSH terms