Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;32(4):263-271.
doi: 10.1159/000446385. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

HCC-Associated Liver Transplantation - Where Are the Limits and What Are the New Regulations?

Affiliations
Review

HCC-Associated Liver Transplantation - Where Are the Limits and What Are the New Regulations?

Christian P Strassburg. Visc Med. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents an increasing health burden worldwide and a challenging disease both in terms of diagnosis and treatment.

Methods: The literature available on PubMed for the period of 1990-2016 was reviewed with reference to liver allocation, HCC, liver transplantation (LT), and prediction, and the allocation rules of the German Transplant Act were reviewed.

Results: Due to etiological and geographical diversity, HCC is not a homogeneous disease. In the vast majority of patients, HCC develops as a complication of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. While most patients present with advanced HCC for which palliative strategies are the only available option, LT is the best treatment approach as it not only eliminates the diseased liver and the underlying hepatocarcinogenic mechanisms but also the cancer. The decision for LT is not an easy one to make, because outcome prediction, staging, bridging therapy, and recurrence prevention are difficult and are estimated against the background of the scarce resource of donor organs which are also competitively sought after by patients suffering from non-neoplastic terminal liver diseases, raising the issue of equality of chances in a rationed therapeutic modality. Currently, the Milan criteria are the best evaluated decision tool for LT, but many issues such as down-staging, favorable biological behavior during treatment, expansion of the morphological classification, molecular predictors, and individualized approaches are not yet satisfactorily addressed.

Conclusion: In order to provide a fair and effective approach to LT in HCC, the employed allocation rules require continuous development and scientific evaluation. Recently, the allocation rules for standard exception priority according to the German Transplant Act have been revised to improve patient selection for LT in HCC.

Keywords: Allocation rules; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver transplantation; Milan criteria; Outcome prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Etiologies of HCC in 533 patients at the Bonn University Hospital (Bonn University Hospital Cohort). AIH = Autoimmune hepatitis; A1AT = alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency; NASH = non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; PBC = primary biliary cholangitis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Staging system based on the BCLC classification employed in LT in HCC. (modified according to [5])
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
BCLC stages of 453 HCC patients seen at the Bonn University Hospital. Only about a quarter of the patients have stages allowing a curative approach.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Availability of histological specimens in 533 HCC patients seen at Bonn University Hospital. In about 50%, no histology is available, which is largely influenced by the BCLC staging classification and recommendations.

References

    1. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012;379:1245–1255. - PubMed
    1. Bruix J, Reig M, Sherman M. Evidence-based diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:835–853. - PubMed
    1. Llovet JM, Bustamante J, Castells A, Vilana R, Ayuso Mdel C, Sala M, Bru C, Rodes J, Bruix J. Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma: Rationale for the design and evaluation of therapeutic trials. Hepatology. 1999;29:62–67. - PubMed
    1. Soriano A, Varona A, Gianchandani R, Moneva ME, Arranz J, Gonzalez A, Barrera M. Selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation: past and future. World J Hepatol. 2016;8:58–68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazzanti R, Arena U, Tassi R. Hepatocellular carcinoma: where are we? World J Exp Med. 2016;6:21–36. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources