Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;61(1):43-50.
doi: 10.1007/s10384-016-0481-x. Epub 2016 Oct 8.

Clinical practice pattern in management of diabetic macular edema in Japan: survey results of Japanese retinal specialists

Affiliations

Clinical practice pattern in management of diabetic macular edema in Japan: survey results of Japanese retinal specialists

Yuichiro Ogura et al. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To elucidate the current clinical practice patterns of diabetic macular edema (DME) management by retinal specialists in Japan in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.

Methods: Forty-six retinal specialists were administered a survey regarding the pathology and clinical practice of DME.

Results: Nearly, half of the specialists (45.2 %) think that the main biochemical factor involved in DME development is the vascular permeability-potentiating action of VEGF-A. Most specialists (70.6 %) use three modalities for detecting DME: optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and fundus examination. For focal macular edema, focal laser is used as first-line therapy by 70.3 % of specialists, whereas 21.6 % use medical treatment in combination with focal/grid laser. For diffuse macular edema, anti-VEGF therapy is the first choice (72.5 %), irrespective of visual acuity, whereas 17.5 % select off-label sub-Tenon's steroid injections. Vitrectomy is often performed for vitreomacular traction (86.5 %) or when anti-VEGF agent/laser therapy is ineffective (73.2 %). For persistent DME after vitrectomy, anti-VEGF agents (46.3 %) or steroids (intravitreal injections, 14.6 %; sub-Tenon's injections, 36.6 %) are selected. When applying anti-VEGF treatment regimen, most specialists continue loading injections until central retinal thickness stabilized (51.4 %) or both visual acuity and central retinal thickness stabilized (24.3 %). In the maintenance phase, many specialists provide injections with pro re nata (76.3 %), whereas 50.0 % responded that the treat-and-extend regimen is ideal.

Conclusions: Our survey presents the current views about the DME management and practice patterns of anti-VEGF therapy by one part of the retinal specialists in Japan, and highlights the differences or gaps between evidence and actual clinical practice.

Keywords: Anti-VEGF agents; Clinical practice pattern; Diabetic macular edema; Laser photocoagulation; Vitrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2011 Jun;115(6):523-8 - PubMed
    1. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2014 Jun;118(6):495-501 - PubMed
    1. Diabetologia. 2004 Aug;47(8):1411-5 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):615-25 - PubMed
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun;100(6):787-95 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources