Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;29(4):10.1111/nmo.12970.
doi: 10.1111/nmo.12970. Epub 2016 Oct 9.

Impact of symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) on esophageal motor diagnoses

Affiliations

Impact of symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) on esophageal motor diagnoses

C A Reddy et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: High-resolution manometry (HRM) categorizes esophageal motor processes into specific Chicago Classification (CC) diagnoses, but the clinical impact of these motor diagnoses on symptom burden remain unclear.

Methods: Two hundred and eleven subjects (56.8±1.0 years, 66.8% F) completed symptom questionnaires (GERDQ, Mayo dysphagia questionnaire [MDQ], visceral sensitivity index, short-form 36, dominant symptom index, and global symptom severity [GSS] on a 100-mm visual analog scale) prior to HRM. Subjects were stratified according to CC v3.0 and by dominant presenting symptom; contraction wave abnormalities (CWA) were evaluated within "normal" CC. Symptom burden, impact of diagnoses, and HRQOL were compared within and between cohorts.

Key results: Major motor disorders had highest global symptom burden (P=.02), "normal" had lowest (P<.01). Dysphagia (MDQ) was highest with esophageal outflow obstruction (P=.02), but reflux symptoms (GERDQ) were similar in CC cohorts (P=ns). Absent contractility aligned best with minor motor disorders. Consequently, pathophysiologic categorization into outflow obstruction, hypermotility, and hypomotility resulted in a gradient of decreasing dysphagia and increasing reflux burden (P<.05 across groups); GSS (P=.05) was highest with hypomotility and lowest with "normal" (P=.002). Within the "normal" cohort, 33.3% had CWA; this subgroup had symptom burden similar to hypermotility. Upon stratification by symptoms, symptom burden (GSS, MDQ, HRQOL) was most profound with dysphagia.

Conclusions and inferences: Chicago Classification v3.0 diagnoses identify subjects with highest symptom burden, but pathophysiologic categorization may allow better stratification by symptom type and burden. Contraction wave abnormalities are clinically relevant and different from true normal motor function. Transit symptoms have highest yield for a motor diagnosis.

Keywords: Chicago Classification; dysphagia; high-resolution manometry; symptom burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dysphagia severity (Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire) and GERDQ impact score across motor groups. A. Dysphagia severity and GERDQ impact scores follow gradients in opposite directions when absent contractility is extracted out of the major motor disorders category. B. Similar gradients are maintained when motor disorders are grouped by pathophysiologic mechanisms to outflow obstruction, hypermotility disorders and hypomotility disorders, where absent contractility is included with hypomotility disorders.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Dysphagia severity (Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire) and GERDQ impact score across motor groups. A. Dysphagia severity and GERDQ impact scores follow gradients in opposite directions when absent contractility is extracted out of the major motor disorders category. B. Similar gradients are maintained when motor disorders are grouped by pathophysiologic mechanisms to outflow obstruction, hypermotility disorders and hypomotility disorders, where absent contractility is included with hypomotility disorders.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportions of motor diagnosis according to presenting symptom. A. Chicago Classification 3.0 diagnosis groups. The ‘normal’ group is further categorized into those with contraction wave abnormalities (CWA) and true normal. B. Pathophysiologic groups. The hypermotility group includes diffuse esophageal spasm and hypercontractile disorder (jackhammer esophagus), and the hypomotility group includes ineffective esophageal motility, fragmented peristalsis and absent contractility.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportions of motor diagnosis according to presenting symptom. A. Chicago Classification 3.0 diagnosis groups. The ‘normal’ group is further categorized into those with contraction wave abnormalities (CWA) and true normal. B. Pathophysiologic groups. The hypermotility group includes diffuse esophageal spasm and hypercontractile disorder (jackhammer esophagus), and the hypomotility group includes ineffective esophageal motility, fragmented peristalsis and absent contractility.

References

    1. Gyawali CP, Bredenoord AJ, Conklin JL, et al. Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:99–133. - PubMed
    1. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan WW, Haroian LR, Gyawali CP. Value of preoperative esophageal function studies before laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2943–9. - PubMed
    1. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Santos BF, et al. Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes one year after peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3359–65. - PubMed
    1. Nicodeme F, de Ruigh A, Xiao Y, et al. A comparison of symptom severity and bolus retention with Chicago classification esophageal pressure topography metrics in patients with achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:131–7. quiz e15. - PMC - PubMed