Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:3693096.
doi: 10.1155/2016/3693096. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

Concentration and Methylation of Cell-Free DNA from Blood Plasma as Diagnostic Markers of Renal Cancer

Affiliations

Concentration and Methylation of Cell-Free DNA from Blood Plasma as Diagnostic Markers of Renal Cancer

Inessa Skrypkina et al. Dis Markers. 2016.

Abstract

The critical point for successful treatment of cancer is diagnosis at early stages of tumor development. Cancer cell-specific methylated DNA has been found in the blood of cancer patients, indicating that cell-free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in the blood is a convenient tumor-associated DNA marker. Therefore methylated cfDNA can be used as a minimally invasive diagnostic marker. We analysed the concentration of plasma cfDNA and methylation of six tumor suppressor genes in samples of 27 patients with renal cancer and 15 healthy donors as controls. The cfDNA concentrations in samples from cancer patients and healthy donors was measured using two different methods, the SYBR Green I fluorescence test and quantitative real-time PCR. Both methods revealed a statistically significant increase of cfDNA concentrations in cancer patients. Hypermethylation on cfDNA was detected for the LRRC3B (74.1%), APC (51.9%), FHIT (55.6%), and RASSF1 (62.9%) genes in patients with renal cancer. Promoter methylation of VHL and ITGA9 genes was not found on cfDNA. Our results confirmed that the cfDNA level and methylation of CpG islands of RASSF1A, FHIT, and APC genes in blood plasma can be used as noninvasive diagnostic markers of cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of cfDNA concentration in plasma of patients with renal carcinoma and controls. cfDNA concentrations were determined by measuring the fluorescence level of intercalated SYBR Green I dye (a) and by qPCR (c). ROC curve analysis of cfDNA concentration in cancer patients compared with the control group ((b) fluorescence test; (d) qPCR).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves obtained by using different models for the discrimination between healthy controls (n = 15) and renal carcinoma patients (n = 27). Conc_qPCR: concentration of cfDNA determined by qPCR.

References

    1. Banumathy G., Cairns P. Signaling pathways in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Biology and Therapy. 2010;10(7):658–664. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.7.13247. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta K., Miller J. D., Li J. Z., Russell M. W., Charbonneau C. Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2008;34(3):193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.12.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine. The Features Diagnosis and Prognosis Factors Renal Cell Carcinoma. Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine; 2011. http://www.souu.org.ua.
    1. World Cancer Research Fund International/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Report: Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Kidney Cancer. 2015.
    1. Lopez-Beltran A., Scarpelli M., Montironi R., Kirkali Z. 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. European Urology. 2006;49(5):798–805. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.035. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources