Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0162680.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162680. eCollection 2016.

How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?

Affiliations

How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?

Kimberley Collins et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Social media has created networked communication channels that facilitate interactions and allow information to proliferate within professional academic communities as well as in informal social circumstances. A significant contemporary discussion in the field of science communication is how scientists are using (or might use) social media to communicate their research. This includes the role of social media in facilitating the exchange of knowledge internally within and among scientific communities, as well as externally for outreach to engage the public. This study investigates how a surveyed sample of 587 scientists from a variety of academic disciplines, but predominantly the academic life sciences, use social media to communicate internally and externally. Our results demonstrate that while social media usage has yet to be widely adopted, scientists in a variety of disciplines use these platforms to exchange scientific knowledge, generally via either Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, or blogs. Despite the low frequency of use, our work evidences that scientists perceive numerous potential advantages to using social media in the workplace. Our data provides a baseline from which to assess future trends in social media use within the science academy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The number of Tweets scientist respondents estimated having posted.

References

    1. Ahlqvist T, Bäck A, Halonen M, Heinonen S. Social media roadmaps: exploring the futures triggered by social media. VTT Tiedotteita—Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus. 2008 Available: http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2008/t2454.pdf
    1. Boyd DM. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. J Comp-Mediated Comm. 2007;13: 210–230. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x - DOI
    1. Haythornthwaite C. Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Inf Comm & Soc. 2005;8: 125–147. 10.1080/13691180500146185 - DOI
    1. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horiz. 2010;53: 59–68. 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 - DOI
    1. Darling ES, Shiffman D, Côté IM, Drew JA. The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. Ideas Ecol Evol. 2013;6: 32–43. 10.4033/iee.2013.6.6.f - DOI

LinkOut - more resources