ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- PMID: 27733354
- PMCID: PMC5062054
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4919
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Abstract
Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: grants from Cochrane, MRC, and NIHR during the conduct of the study. Dr Carpenter reports personal fees from Pfizer, grants and non-financial support from GSK and grants from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Reeves is a co-convenor of the Cochrane Non-Randomised Studies Methods Group. The authors report no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 1996;312:1215-8. 10.1136/bmj.312.7040.1215 pmid:8634569. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Feinstein AR. An additional basic science for clinical medicine: II. The limitations of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 1983;99:544-50. 10.7326/0003-4819-99-4-544 pmid:6625387. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Strom B. Overview of automated databases in pharmacoepidemiology. In: Strom BL, Hennessy S, eds. Pharmacoepidemiology. 5th ed. Wiley, 2012.
-
- Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JPT. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:666-76. 10.1093/ije/dym018 pmid:17470488. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, et al. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:iii-x, 1-173. 10.3310/hta7270 pmid:14499048. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical