The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and Pathology: Toward Strengthening the Critical Relationship
- PMID: 27740970
- PMCID: PMC5106320
- DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000749
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and Pathology: Toward Strengthening the Critical Relationship
Abstract
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute collects data on cancer diagnoses, treatment, and survival for approximately 30% of the United States (US) population. To reflect advances in research and oncology practice, approaches to cancer control are evolving from simply enumerating the development of cancers by organ site in populations to including monitoring of cancer occurrence by histopathologic and molecular subtype, as defined by driver mutations and other alterations. SEER is an important population-based resource for understanding the implications of pathology diagnoses across demographic groups, geographic regions, and time and provides unique insights into the practice of oncology in the US that are not attainable from other sources. It provides incidence, survival, and mortality data for histopathologic cancer subtypes, and data by molecular subtyping are expanding. The program is developing systems to capture additional biomarker data, results from special populations, and expand biospecimen banking to enable cutting-edge cancer research and oncology practice. Pathology has always been central and critical to the effectiveness of SEER, and strengthening this relationship in this modern era of cancer diagnosis could be mutually beneficial. Achieving this goal requires close interactions between pathologists and the SEER program. This review provides a brief overview of SEER, focuses on facets relevant to pathology practice and research, and highlights the opportunities and challenges for pathologists to benefit from and enhance the value of SEER data.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
References
-
- Horlings HM, Flanagan AM, Huntsman DG. Categorization of cancer through genomic complexity could guide research and management strategies. J Pathol. 2015 Aug;236:397–402. - PubMed
-
- Alexander CB. Pathology graduate medical education (overview from 2006–2010) Hum Pathol. 2011;42:763–769. - PubMed
-
- Nakhleh RE. Core components of a comprehensive quality assurance program in anatomic pathology. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009;16:418–423. - PubMed
-
- Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, et al. Molecular Testing Guideline for Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for EGFR and ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Molecular Diagnostics. 2013;15:416–453. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
