Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;128(5):958-963.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001686.

Female Genital Mutilation: A Visual Reference and Learning Tool for Health Care Professionals

Affiliations

Female Genital Mutilation: A Visual Reference and Learning Tool for Health Care Professionals

Jasmine Abdulcadir et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Female genital mutilation comprises all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or injury to the female genital organs for nonmedical reasons. Health care providers for women and girls living with female genital mutilation have reported difficulties in recognizing, classifying, and recording female genital mutilation, which can adversely affect treatment of complications and discussions of the prevention of the practice in future generations. According to the World Health Organization, female genital mutilation is classified into four types, subdivided into subtypes. An agreed-upon classification of female genital mutilation is important for clinical practice, management, recording, and reporting, as well as for research on prevalence, trends, and consequences of female genital mutilation. We provide a visual reference and learning tool for health care professionals. The tool can be consulted by caregivers when unsure on the type of female genital mutilation diagnosed and used for training and surveys for monitoring the prevalence of female genital mutilation types and subtypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organization. Eliminating female genital mutilation. An interagency statement-OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO. 2008. Available at: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw52/statements_missions/Interagen....
    1. Berg RC, Underland V, Odgaard-Jensen J, Fretheim A, Vist GE. Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2014;4:e006316.
    1. Berg RC, Denison E, Fretheim A. Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review on quantitative studies. Report from Kunnskapssenteret nr 13-2010. Oslo (Norway): Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten; 2010.
    1. WHO Study Group on Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcome. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet 2006;367:1835–41.
    1. Abdulcadir J, Dugerdil A, Boulvain M, Yaron M, Margairaz C, Irion O. Missed opportunities for diagnosis of female genital mutilation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014;125:256–60.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources