Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;63(4):242-257.
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.188. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

Palliative care in cancer: managing patients' expectations

Wsam A Ghandourh  1
Affiliations
Review

Palliative care in cancer: managing patients' expectations

Wsam A Ghandourh. J Med Radiat Sci. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Advanced cancer patients commonly have misunderstandings about the intentions of treatment and their overall prognosis. Several studies have shown that large numbers of patients receiving palliative radiation or chemotherapy hold unrealistic hopes of their cancer being cured by such therapies, which can affect their ability to make well-informed decisions about treatment options. This review aimed to explore this discrepancy between patients' and physicians' expectations by investigating three primary issues: (1) the factors associated with patients developing unrealistic expectations; (2) the implications of having unrealistic hopes and the effects of raising patients' awareness about prognosis; and (3) patients' and caregivers' perspective on disclosure and their preferences for communication styles. Relevant studies were identified by searching electronic databases including Pubmed, EMBASE and ScienceDirect using multiple combinations of keywords, which yielded a total of 65 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The discrepancy between patients' and doctors' expectations was associated with many factors including doctors' reluctance to disclose terminal prognoses and patients' ability to understand or accept such information. The majority of patients and caregivers expressed a desire for detailed prognostic information; however, varied responses have been reported on the preferred style of conveying such information. Communication styles have profound effects on patients' experience and treatment choices. Patients' views on disclosure are influenced by many cultural, psychological and illness-related factors, therefore individuals' needs must be considered when conveying prognostic information. More research is needed to identify communication barriers and the interventions that could be used to increase patients' satisfaction with palliative care.

Keywords: Advanced cancer; communication of prognosis; palliative therapies; patients’ expectations; patients’ preferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A flow diagram describing the literature search process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hoegler D. Radiotherapy for palliation of symptoms in incurable cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 1997; 21: 129–83. - PubMed
    1. Robinson TM, Alexander SC, Hays M, et al. Patient–oncologist communication in advanced cancer: Predictors of patient perception of prognosis. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16: 1049–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sapir R, Catane R, Kaufman B, et al. Cancer patient expectations of and communication with oncologists and oncology nurses: The experience of an integrated oncology and palliative care service. Support Care Cancer 2002; 8: 458–63. - PubMed
    1. Chow E, Andersson L, Wong R, et al. Patients with advanced cancer: A survey of the understanding of their illness and expectations from palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic metastases. Clin Oncol 2001; 13: 204–8. - PubMed
    1. Temel JS, Greer JA, Admane S, et al. Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer: Results of a randomized study of early palliative care. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2319–26. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources